Lough Foyle Carcinogens quietly forgotton

In light of a recent $670 million Dupont settlement in America we unearthed some information on pollution and chemical spills in and around Lough Foyle including a 1990 Irish Times'  article,  on carcinogenic chemicals found in Lough Foyle salmon,  an 1992 Independent article on an unreported chemical spill from DuPont (UK) Ltd.  Both are followed by an Irish Government debate at the time, such as it was.  Finally we include a 2016 Derry Now article on a suppressed 2014 study on effects of pollution on Derry residents.

Du Pont (UK) Ltd jetty at Maydown on Lough Foyle.  Coolkeeragh power station - centre

click image to enlarge


Oireachtas Debate December 1991 on BIM report

click to view debate

This is the only Irish Government debate on the above report that we managed to get.  It is interesting to see the difference in emphasis between the BIM report and the response from the Irish Minister for the Marine Mr Wilson. 


click image to enlarge


Oireachtas Debate October 1992 on above toxic discharge.

Click to view debate

 

Minister of State Dept of Marine Mr. P. Gallagher"What disappoints me is that there was a structure in relation to the Foyle and there was no reason why the company could not have informed their Department of the Environment, who in turn could have informed Donegal County Council and the North-Western Health Board. "

 


2014 Pollution Report Suppressed

click Image to enlarge


More Bad News About Water Safety Could Affect Millions of Americans

 

New research suggests that industrial chemicals in public drinking water have exceeded federal safety levels for 6 million Americans.

A study just released by two departments at Harvard University reported that unacceptable levels of polyfluoroalkyl and perfluoroalkyl chemicals (PFASs)—linked to a host of ailments including cancer, obesity and hormone disruption—are circulating in the nation’s drinking water supply.

Here’s more from the research team’s findings, as reported in a news release from the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health:

“For many years, chemicals with unknown toxicities, such as PFASs, were allowed to be used and released to the environment, and we now have to face the severe consequences,” said lead author Xindi Hu, a doctoral student in the Department of Environmental Health at Harvard Chan School and Environmental Science and Engineering at SEAS. “In addition, the actual number of people exposed may be even higher than our study found, because government data for levels of these compounds in drinking water is lacking for almost a third of the U.S. population—about 100 million people.”

The study found that PFASs were detectable at the minimum reporting levels required by the EPA in 194 out of 4,864 water supplies in 33 states across the U.S. Drinking water from 13 states accounted for 75% of the detections, including, in order of frequency of detection, California, New Jersey, North Carolina, Alabama, Florida, Pennsylvania, Ohio, New York, Georgia, Minnesota, Arizona, Massachusetts, and Illinois.

Read the full study, released Tuesday, here


Irish agriculture faces emissions dilemma

 

Dairy cows in County Mayo in the west of Ireland. (Pat O’Malley via Flickr)

Pledges by Ireland to cut its emissions of greenhouse gases look set to be undermined by government plans for a major expansion of the country’s agricultural sector.

LONDON, 24 July, 2016 – Ireland is facing a classic conflict, pitching economic growth targets against the need for action on climate change.

On one hand, Ireland’s planners want to see significant growth in its food and agriculture industry – a sector that is one of the main pillars of the country’s economy, accounting for about 8% of gross domestic product.

On the other hand, the country − along with other members of the European Union (EU) − is committed to lowering greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by “at least” 40% below 1990 levels by 2030.

The dilemma is that about a third of Ireland’s total emissions already come from agriculture and food production − from methane produced by the flatulence of the country’s seven million cattle, and from the widespread use of nitrogen-based fertilisers on its abundant grasslands.

Binding targets

The publication of a new report, produced jointly by Ireland’s Institute of International and European Affairs (IIEA) and the Royal Dublin Society (RDS) highlights the clash between government economic goals and EU binding targets for bringing down GHG emissions.

“Ruminant-based agriculture is of crucial importance to the Irish economy, and Ireland’s land use pattern is exceptional by EU comparison,” the report says.

“Plans for the continued expansion of food output, focused in particular on the dairy sector, and increasingly stringent emissions reductions suggest a growing contradiction between Ireland’s climate and agriculture policy objectives.”

The report recommends that farmers become more “climate smart”. Large-scale investments need to be made in new technology and science in order to promote more carbon-efficient dairy and beef production systems. And the agricultural sector should also encourage more recycling and renewable energy use.

The rate of afforestation should also be speeded up. About 11% of Ireland’s land is currently forested, compared to an EU average of more than 40%.

“Over the coming decades, emissions from agriculture and land use will increasingly become centre stage as other sectors of the global economy are decarbonised”

Under the government’s Food Wise 2025 programme, a near doubling of food and agricultural exports is envisaged over the next nine years.

One of the central aims of the plan is a big expansion of Ireland’s dairy and beef herds − and, in so doing, the creation of thousands of jobs in often disadvantaged rural areas. At present, Ireland’s agriculture and food sector accounts for 11% of exports and nearly 9% of employment.

But GHG emissions from the sector are proportionately larger than those of any other EU state − and methane is a considerably more powerful GHG than carbon dioxide, even though it stays in the atmosphere for a comparatively far shorter period.

The IIEA/RDS report says agricultural emissions are increasing, and warns that if Ireland does not take steps to meet GHG reduction targets it will have to pay millions of euros in fines to the EU.

Farming organisations, which have considerable influence in Ireland, have objected to the report and have successfully lobbied politicians both at home and in Brussels for reduced emissions targets.

Under new European Commission rules, member countries’ agriculture sector emissions can be offset by planting more forests and other beneficial environmental practices.

Loopholes for polluters

The move has been strongly criticised by environmental organisations. They say the new measures provide too many loopholes for polluters, while Green parties in the European Parliament accuse the Commission of behaving “as if the COP21 Paris climate summit never happened”.

In Ireland, environmental organisations say there must be a complete reversal of government policy if agriculture is to become sustainable, with a shift away from livestock and from the consumption of red meat and dairy products.

The IIEA/RDS study says other countries are facing similar problems to Ireland’s. “Over the coming decades, emissions from agriculture and land use will increasingly become centre stage as other sectors of the global economy are decarbonised,” it says.

“A key conclusion of this analysis is that Ireland can consider itself a test case for dealing with these issues.” – Climate News Network

Source: Kieran Cooke, climatenewsnetwork.net, July 24, 2016