DuPont to pay $670 million to settle C8 lawsuits

Lawrence Moody said he is satisfied that he and 3,550 other people are finally getting justice.

"You just can't do that to people," the Washington County man said after DuPont and its spinoff company Chemours agreed to pay nearly $671 million to Mid-Ohio Valley people affected by a chemical used to make Teflon that causes cancer and a host of other health problems.

The settlement was announced Monday during the trial of Moody's lawsuit in U.S. District Court in Columbus. Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus Jr. sent the jury home without a verdict.

Moody's lawyers argued that DuPont covered up that the chemical C8, also known as perfluorooctanoic acid, was toxic. The chemical spewed into the air and Ohio River from DuPont's Washington Works plant south of Parkersburg, West Virginia, since the 1950s. The lawyers said the company knew since 1980 that it caused cancer in rats.

"It took away having the option to protect my family, not knowing, 'Should you drink the water or not?' " said Moody, 57, who has testicular cancer.

A study found that, in general, area residents who drank water from wells near the plant had a median level of 38 parts per billion of C8 in their blood — 7.6 times more than the average American. In 2012, a science panel concluded a "probable link" existed between C8 and six diseases: kidney cancer, testicular cancer, ulcerative colitis, thyroid disease, pregnancy-induced hypertension and high cholesterol.

The 200 or so plaintiffs with cancer are expected to receive at least $1 million. At the lower end, those with high cholesterol could receive awards in the five figures.

"This agreement provides a sound resolution for area residents, Chemours, and the public," said David C. Shelton, general counsel for Chemours. "It settles all indemnification obligations between Chemours and DuPont for all of the approximately 3,500 claims in the Ohio multi-district litigation and allows us to move forward with a renewed focus on our customers, product innovation and application development."

DuPont spun off Chemours last year to take over the production of Teflon and other "performance chemicals" products at the Washington Works plant. Defense attorneys said it was an attempt to load its lawsuit debt on Chemours and erase its own liability.

Observers said a planned merger with Dow Chemical — as well as the increasing jury awards in C8 cases — motivated DuPont to step up settlement talks.

Also, Sargus had recruited other federal judges to begin tackling the more expensive cancer cases in May at the rate of 40 over 10 months each year.

DuPont lost the previous three suits tried in Columbus. The last jury said the chemical giant owed $2 million in general damages and, in January, $10.5 million in punitive damages to another Ohio man with testicular cancer.

DuPont has argued that it reacted to the problem using the best science of the time, and spent $594 million to address the problem.

Attorneys for the plaintiffs countered that the company has a "staggering" $18.8 billion that can be converted to cash, including $4.5 billion in cash and other sources. The $2 million it paid a claimant in general damages, the company makes in 42 minutes, they said.

Prosecutors in the Netherlands have begun a criminal investigation into possible C8 contamination from a DuPont plant there.

Source: The Columbus Dispatch Feb 13 2017
See also: Jury awards $10.5 million in punitive damages in DuPont cancer case


Republican leaky principles and Government's economy with truth over Lough Foyle sovereignty

by James Quigley

 

It is now almost twenty years since the Good Friday Agreement or (Belfast Agreement).  It came into effective in 1999 after, what some might say, was an ultimatum presented to the war weary people of Ireland, especially British colonial north - either sign or continue with the oppression, murder and mayhem. 

It involved the Irish Republic amending it's constitution giving up territorial claim on the whole of Ireland and reassuring unionists that a united Ireland would not come about without consent of a majority of the Northern Ireland electorate. 

The British Government of Ireland Act 1922  was amended to declare "that Northern Ireland in its entirety remains part of the United Kingdom and shall not cease to be so without the consent of a majority of the people of Northern Ireland."

For Republicans it was presented as a victory.  Deals were done behind the scene between IRA leadership, Britain and Ireland for release of political prisoners and the Republican propaganda was that a United Ireland was around the corner.  Little was mentioned about the reality that the IRA campaign had reached it's end, the movement rife with informers and infiltrated with British agents.

The above link describing the Good Friday Agreement says"the vague wording of some of the provisions, described as "constructive ambiguity" (Arthur Aughey), helped ensure acceptance of the agreement and served to postpone debate on some of the more contentious issues." 

No doubt one of these contentious issues is the unresolved ownership of Lough Foyle and Carlingford Lough, a major ambiguity but somehow we can not describe it as 'constructive'. 

In this article we are continuing the series of articles on the sovereigntyof Lough Foyle, a rich vein which gets bigger and bigger the more we dig into it.  The following article appeared in Irish Republican News, June 19, 2009.   It clearly shows how Sinn Féin knew all along about the problem, about the Crown Estates' claim and that the Irish Government was paying rent to them.  It looks very much like all sides were economical with the truth which goes on even to this day,  'constructive ambiguity' indeed. 

It is interesting to compare present day Sinn Féin's more political correctness with the more firebrand attitude in the article.   It could be viewed as an analogy of Sinn Féin's role in Stormont today. 

This comparison can be made between what Pádraig MacLochlainn, Sinn Féin, statement on a recent RTE Prime Time programme and the following article.   There was no admission that Sinn Féin knew anything about the Irish Government paying rent,  about the Crown Estate ownership, or the rent being paid.    The change of direction is interesting,  from attacking the Irish Government to putting the blame fully on the British Government.  Of course no blame fell on the shoulders of his own party, signatory, as they were, to the 1998 Good Friday Agreement. 

Mr MacLochlainn said

"Somebody is at fault here and the Irish Government, in my opinion, aren't at fault.  I think they should call out the British Government and say the difficulty is on the British side and the British Government should be honest and open about why they won't resolve ownership of this Lough"

The following Irish Republican Article Colonial rents paid for Irish Lough from http://www.epa.ie/licences/lic_eDMS/090151b28054b885.pdf  Use side bar to scroll down

Other sources:

http://www.derryjournal.com/news/anger-as-british-force-inishowen-ferry-to-pay-taxes-1-2138317/amp

http://buncranatogether.com/home/2016/12/8/northern-ireland-fisheries-minister-michelle-mcilveen-on-lough-foyle-jurisdiction-dispute?rq=lough%20foyle

http://buncranatogether.com/home/2016/11/18/brexit-revives-territorial-dispute-between-uk-and-ireland-over-lough-foyle?rq=lough%20foyle

http://buncranatogether.com/home/2016/11/18/uk-claim-on-lough-foyle-has-never-been-settled?rq=lough%20foyle

 


Greencastle Residents dispute Donegal's HSE drinking water test

Residents in Greencastle are questioning the integrity of recent tests result received from the HSE, Donegal, which were carried out on drinking water in the area. The tests were done on 18th January 2017 by the Public Analysis Laboratory, Galway from samples taken on 16th January. 

Residents are not happy with the thoroughness of the tests, the method and scope of sampling and the chemical parameters that were tested.  For example there is no mention THMs (trihalomethanes), a chemical compound that the residents were particularly worried about and many other chemicals used in drinking water treatment plants.

Ballymacarthur water treatment plant Greencastle Co Donegal.  At the rear there are 3 small sand filter beds. 

Greencastle and Ballymacarthur treatment plant marked in red

click to view test

This water test came about after a year long campaign by residents over high levels of THMs (thrihalomethances) in drinking water from the Ballymacarthur water treatment plant in the Greencastle area. Residents were alerted to problems in drinking water by an EPA report which stated that 10 water treatment plants in Donegal exceeded THMs limits.

The most recent EPA Remedial Action List , 2016, lists Greencastle as having a total of 203ug/l THMs, the highest in Donegal.  See EPA RAL 2016 (remedial action list)  here http://epa.ie/pubs/reports/water/drinking/dwralq4of2016.html

EPA records prior to 2012 also identified exceedance levels of THMs in the Greencastle water and they submitted an remedial action plan in 2011 with a completion date of September 2013 recommended.

This data was taken form EPA Report for Year 2011

Residents cancer survey

Recently a small survey of incidences of cancers was undertaken by residents in one area of Greencastle.  It found that in one residential area alone where 16 families live, there were 10 known cases of cancer.  Some of these people have died while others are currently receiving treatment.  One local resident, who does not wish to be named said

“We want to know if there is a link between the high levels of THMs in our water supply and the very high rate of cancers in Greencastle.  Surely more in depth studies on this relationship should be undertaken.  We are so worried and need to be assured that chemicals used for treating our water supply is not damaging our health.  We need regular monitoring and tests carried out in a transparent way and they need to be ongoing .  Remedial action must be done immediately.

Lough Fad supplies Moville and Redcastle area.  Photo show low level of water.

A year ago we approached our local council but nothing has been done and our plant remains open. We want this plant which is exceeding THMs limits closed with immediate effect and the correct infrastructure put in place to ensure that our community has clean and safe drinking water.

Water testing was carried out here in recent weeks but we are suspicious the way in which they were done.   At the time of the test, water was being pumped in advance from Lough Fad to deliberately dilute the concentration of Thms further down towards Greencastle.  As predicted, the results from the HSE were within the normal range.

This photograph of Lough Fad taken earlier this week shows water levels at an all time low. It is obvious that the reservoir cannot sustain the Greencastle supply in addition to its normal supply and as a result will have to stop pumping to Greencastle. This means that the level of THMs will return to the EPA’s stated dangerously high levels.”

 

Helen Clarke a concerned resident said that they have sent an email to Irish Water pointing out that remedial action is long overdue.  Residents feel that they must be kept informed about any new planned infrastructure, when this will take place, what it entails, when will work be tendered out and the timescale involved.  They want to know what solutions will be put in place while the remedial work is done.   They call on all Councillors, TDs and Senators, to take a proactive interest in this serious health issue and support the Greencastle community in finding an urgent solution.

 

Mr Enda Craig, a local Moville environmentalist,  who has been highlighting this issue for some time, said that when he was made aware of the test results he contacted the Environmental Health Officer in Buncrana and asked.

"why the water analysis did not contain any mention of tests for Trihalomethane's, (THMs) .  I was told that the tests had been taken at a different location.

The question immediately arises why?  Surely the THM test should have been carried out on the water sample taken in St Paul's park.  Or could it be the HSE wanted to test a water sample at a different location which would be known to contain a substantial percentage of THM compliant Redcastle water which come from Lough Fad.

Click image to enlarge

Why was there no mention of Fluoride in the results from water samples taken in St Paul's park?   If, as Irish Water states, that twenty five per cent of Redcastle water ( which contains Fluoride) is now mixed with the Ballymacarthur supplied water then how come no Fluoride was detected in St Paul's park.

Could it be that the Redcastle water does not get as far as St Paul's park in the first place and that the statement from Irish Water is a hoodwink,  to say the very least. Every way you look at this water testing escapade there is an overwhelming need for further detailed answers. It would never be possible that the HSE has been gambling with people's health in an attempt to cover the fact that the promised infrastructure from Irish Water is already way  behind schedule. Either way let's have some upfront straight answers."

 

Short history of T rihalomethane/Chlorine in Ireland water treatment

Between 2002 and 2009Ireland was condemned on a number of occasions by the European court of Justice for it’s high levels of E-coli and Cryptosporidium caused by faecal contamination.  Both conditions manifest as a serious form of gastro-intestinal illness in humans that can be fatal.

This European intervention resulted in Ireland introducing chlorine to disinfect the water supply, a cost cutting measure which treated the symptoms rather than the cause.  Ireland was advised against this measure by Europe but ignored the advise.

Chlorine is known to react with organic matter including bog water, faeces, dead animals and can produce trihalomethane (THMs), a known cause of cancer.  Long-term exposure is reported to carry increased risks of cancers, including bladder and colon cancer and can cause damage to the heart, lungs, liver, kidney and the central nervous system. While chlorine suppresses the e-coli bug, it has little effect on Cryptosporidium.  Now the European Commission has confirmed that it will be taking proceedings against Ireland to address the ongoing concerns of THMs in drinking water.

Sources:

http://buncranatogether.com/home/2017/1/30/eu-to-take-action-over-states-dangerous-drinking-water?rq=Thms

http://buncranatogether.com/home/2016/2/18/the-emerald-isles-pure-clear-waters-are-swimming-in-carcinogenic-trihalomethanes?rq=trihalo

http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/dwq/chemicals/trihalomethanes_summary_statement.pdf

https://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Publications/techrep42/TR42-16.pdf

http://www.hse.ie/eng/services/Publications/Environmentalhealth/Joint%20Position%20Statement%20Trihalomethanes%20in%20Drinking%20Water.pdf