EU to take action over State’s ‘dangerous’ drinking water

Republic faces infringement proceedings due to the presence of chemicals in its supply

‘THMs are carcinogenic chemicals formed when chlorine is added to purify water.’ Photograph: Getty Images/iStockphoto

The European Commission will take infringement proceedings against Ireland due to dangerous levels of chemicals found in drinking water.

The commission wrote to the Department of Housing this month confirming that a pilot case it had initiated into the level of trihalomethanes (THMs) in the water system has been closed.

In the correspondence, it confirmed that further “treatment” would now be necessary to deal with the chemicals, which have been linked to cancer.

A spokesman said the commission would now move to take “more formal steps” in response to ongoing concerns.

Sources confirmed that infringement proceedings would begin within a matter of weeks.

Ireland will be given the opportunity to respond to the action. If its response is inadequate, the commission can take the case to the European Court of Justice, whose judgment is binding.

Significant daily penalties could be imposed by the court if Ireland does not act appropriately.

THMs are chemicals that have been present in many public water supplies for years. They are formed when chlorine is added to purify water.

 

Long-term exposure is reported to carry increased risks of cancers, including of the bladder and colon, and causes damage to the heart, lungs, liver, kidney and central nervous system.

Limited levels

Permissible levels of trihalomethanes in drinking water are limited by the EU drinking water directive and World Health Organisation guidelines.

It is understood that up to 400,000 households in Ireland are affected, including ones in parts Kerry and Cork, Kilkenny city, Waterford, Wicklow, Meath, Mayo, Roscommon, Donegal and Galway.

In May 2015, the European Commission initiated a pilot case here due to THMs levels exceeding guidelines in some drinking water supplies.

A spokesman for the Department for Housing confirmed that correspondence had been received and said it would co-operate fully with the commission.

“Irish Water, working closely with the Department of Housing, Planning, Community and Local Government, has developed plans and programmes to address these THM exceedances where they have arisen,” he said.

“These plans were communicated to the commission as part of the response to the pilot case.

“The commission informed the department last week that it has closed the pilot case but with the intention of further treatment.”

Irish Water said it was unaware of the commission’s response, but the company has already committed to addressing areas with THM by 2021.

Its business plan sets out a clear commitment to reduce the number of all schemes on the agency’s remedial action list, including those affected by trihalomethanes, “to zero”.

Source: Sarah Bardon, Irish Times, Jan 30 2017


 

Buncrana Together

The wheels of European bureaucracy turn very slow. 

One would think that there should have been more urgency considering the deadly consequences of the carcinogenic cocktail in our drinking water, especially in Donegal, one of the more neglected areas in Ireland and in particular Greencastle where levels of thrihalomethanes exceeds accepted levels.  We were told that this was going to be fixed by 2017 .    Many of our articles show the minimising arguments made by Irish health and Government officials. 

Mr Tony Lowes, Friends of the Irish Environment,  said"this decision has come six years after we first brought the issue to the Commission's attention".  He pointed out his article ' Ireland's Poisoned, Dirty water: the cover-up' written by himself and Malcolm Coxall in 2011.

See http://buncranatogether.com/home/2016/2/18/the-emerald-isles-pure-clear-waters-are-swimming-in-carcinogenic-trihalomethanes?rq=trihalo


Ireland passes law to become world's first country to fully divest from fossil fuels

Ethical financing shows global corporations that their tactics are no longer tolerated, says Deputy Pringle

Bill will drop coal, oil and gas investments from Ireland Strategic Investment Fund

Ireland has voted to be the world’s first country to fully divest public money from fossil fuels.

The Irish Parliament passed the historic legislation in a 90 to 53 vote in favour of dropping coal, oil and gas investments from the €8bn (£6.8bn) Ireland Strategic Investment Fund, part of the Republic’s National Treasury Management Agency.


The bill, introduced by Deputy Thomas Pringle, is likely to pass into law in the next few months after it is reviewed by the financial committee.

Ireland has voted to be the world’s first country to fully divest public money from fossil fuels.

The Irish Parliament passed the historic legislation in a 90 to 53 vote in favour of dropping coal, oil and gas investments from the €8bn (£6.8bn) Ireland Strategic Investment Fund, part of the Republic’s National Treasury Management Agency.

The bill, introduced by Deputy Thomas Pringle, is likely to pass into law in the next few months after it is reviewed by the financial committee. 

“This principle of ethical financing is a symbol to these global corporations that their continual manipulation of climate science, denial of the existence of climate change and their controversial lobbying practices of politicians around the world is no longer tolerated,”  Mr Pringle said.

“We cannot accept their actions while millions of poor people in underdeveloped nations bear the brunt of climate change forces as they experience famine, mass emigration and civil unrest as a result.”

Once enacted, the bill would force the Ireland Strategic Investment Fund to sell its investment in fossil fuel industries over the next five years.

In 2015, Norway’s sovereign pension fund divested from some fossil fuel companies, but not all. 

 

Source: www.independent.co.uk Jan 27 2017


No Comeback for Torture -- It's Never Gone Away

Donald Trump used his first nationally televised interview as president to declare his firm belief that "torture works." Of course, as innumerable studies have shown, torture doesn't "work" at all -- if by "work" you mean the gathering of credible information. However, for Trump's purposes, torture will work very well indeed. Thomas Jones, writing in the London Review of Books, points out this apt quote from Why Torture Doesn't Work: The Neuroscience of Interrogation by Professor Shane O'Mara:

"The usual purpose of torture by state actors has not been the extraction of intentionally withheld information in the long-term memory systems of the noncompliant and unwilling. Instead, its purposes have been manifold: the extraction of confessions under duress, the subsequent validation of a suborned legal process by the predeterminedly guilty ('they confessed!'), the spreading of terror, the acquisition and maintenance of power, the denial of epistemic beliefs."

Gosh, it sorta makes you wish there had been some magical way for somebody -- say, the most powerful man on earth -- to have prosecuted American torturers during the last eight years, setting a clear, public example that such blatant evil would never again be tolerated in a civilized society. It's just so unfortunate that the White House and Justice Department were left empty from January 2009 to January 2017, and there was no one around to, you know, actually uphold the law. Darn the luck, eh?

But of course, there WAS someone in the White House during those years -- and he and his minions used torture on an extensive scale. For example, it has been well documented that many thousands of children (and adults) have been psychological scarred by living under the constant threat of drone attack. This has been particularly true in Pakistan, where medical staff tell of children traumatized by the fear of the drones that constantly bombarded remote villages, especially in the earlier years of Obama's presidency. Often the drones would simply sit in the sky above a village for hours on end, coming back for days on end, floating, buzzing, liable to let loose carnage at any moment. It is an exquisite form of torture, the equivalent of tying someone up then walking round and round them day and night while pointing a hair-trigger pistol at their head. And Obama inflicted this on hundreds of thousands of people, day after day, year after year. To what purpose? Why, the "spreading of terror," of course.

It was also done on a smaller scale. Take the case of Chelsea Manning. The use of solitary confinement has been ruled an act of torture. Manning was subjected to this torture repeatedly. (As are thousands of ordinary prisoners across the country every day.) There was no other reason for the use of this torture in the high-profile Manning case than "the spreading of terror": a stark warning to anyone else who might be thinking of revealing American war crimes to the world. Obama's treatment of Manning was repulsive, base and evil -- yet you'll never see Meryl Streep waxing with moral outrage about it.

(And now Trump too has been bashing Manning, labeling her outright as a "traitor," although of course she wasn't charged with or convicted of treason. Trump's words -- the President publicly calling someone a traitor -- could easily lead to Manning's death, as some "patriot" out there takes it upon themselves to carry out the "proper" sentence for a "traitor." She could also face death or maltreatment even before being released -- due to Obama's bizarre decision to delay her release until May, giving her five months under Trump's tender care.)

But let's be clear: whatever he does, Trump will not be bringing torture "back": it's never gone away.

 

Source: Chris Floyd, opednews.com Jan 26 2017