Pulling The Strings Of The Apollo Occupation

Republican community activist Rowan Clarke in the second of a series of pieces shares his thoughts on the Apollo House occupation.

Brendan Ogle Home Sweet Home Press Conference photo; thejournal.ie

Apollo House happened in a flash, a broad collective of political activists and charity volunteers, had stormed a Nama owned abandoned office block on Poolbeg Street, with the purpose of providing shelter within for the homeless particularly the rough sleepers over the Christmas in a safe secure environment with access to professionals and medics willing to volunteer their services.



An exciting prospect and most importantly the perfect springboard to launch a National Housing campaign, lovely. Then when enquiring through the grapevine who was pulling the strings and the main influencer, two words instantly dashed my hopes - Brendan Ogle - there was a collective sigh of disappointment.

For those who don’t know, Brendan Ogle is a well-known and eccentric Trade Union official from Dundalk Co Louth, with a background representing train drivers and later ESB employees and is currently an ‘organiser’ for the UNITE union, who at one time was paid a salary of 80,000 per annum.

In recent times Ogle, has re-emerged as the guru behind the ‘Right2Water’ movement, creating a broad front of political parties and anti-water tax activists under the one umbrella. Later it became ‘Right2Change’ to coincide with impending elections, with many ‘Right2Change’ independents running in their respective constituencies……it was a disaster, yielding very poor results.

Ogle is blamed by many within the water movement as having split it and pacifying what was ultimately a very militant campaign. He was seen many as having infiltrated the movement and using his considerable media and establishment connections (which admittedly are impressive) to manipulate key players and parties into singing to his tune and allowing him to take full control of the issue.

For some of the large marches that took place in the Capital during the Irish Water furore we can thank Brendan Ogle: for his flair for pageantry, orchestration and professional looking events on display top heavy with celebrities, musicians and prominent politicians hungry for votes.

The only thing missing was substance, something that disappeared as soon as Right2Water became the dominant force in fight against the water meters.

Water meter protests died down and organic organising locally dwindled. Eventually Ogle had made everything about electioneering and some would say building a profile for himself. There is little doubt he enjoys the attention!

Before Ogle's foray into Homelessness, he was touring the country promoting his book with the grandiose title 'From Bended Knee To A New Republic: How The Fight For Water Is Changing Ireland' (all for the low price currently of 16.95, formerly 19.99).

When Ogle is mentioned in conversation, the phrase ‘you either love or hate him’ usually comes up.

For me, I neither love not hate Brendan Ogle. I don’t know the man personally. What I do know is he is not the man to position himself the spokesman of both homeless and housing in Ireland and neither are some of the mainstream musicians, famous faces and ‘celebrity activists’ he has installed at the heart of what they are calling ‘HomeSweetHome’ who are essentially pulling the strings of the Apollo occupation.

While critical of the Apollo I am also mindful to be thankful to some of the individuals involved at grassroots level and who I can say are without agendas, who were nice enough to accommodate some vulnerable individuals I know personally who were in dire need of emergency accommodation which wasn’t forthcoming from their respective county councils, social welfare and even some mainstream charity bodies.

In one instance, I was lucky to manage to get a couple known to me personally into Apollo after nearly two days frantically trying to find a place for them to stay after they were the unfortunate to endure a house fire.

It is this aspect of Apollo I am most appreciative about: the good nature of the volunteers, who no doubt kept 40 people clothed, warm, fed and with beds over Christmas. Nobody can dispute that fact, nor discount the thanks they deserve.

But in terms of the overall political aspirations and message emanating from Apollo House, it’s been rather redundant.

The occupation itself has styled itself more a charity, albeit a militant one, than it has as presenting itself as a serious credible attempt to highlight the Housing Crisis and ideas and means to challenge it head on: an opportunity it has had many times but carefully refrained from doing so.

This is no doubt due to the fact that HomeSweetHome campaign has relied heavily on celebrity endorsement as a front to give its lifeblood. We can’t escape the fact it would never have gotten off the ground otherwise. Talk of Social House, scrutiny of the developer class and taking on the landlords wouldn’t go down well as its possible that many of the celebrities, musicians and big names involved are themselves landlords with property portfolios. Some present, certain tax dodgers and all, ultimately belonging to the elite class which controls this country, despite their insistences I’m sure to the contrary.

Al of this, I’ve no doubt is all Ogle's doing.

 

Source: http://thepensivequill.am/2017/01/pulling-strings-of-apollo-occupation.html

Related documents:

 

 

 

 


Then Out Of Nowhere Came Apollo House

Republican community activist Rowan Clarke in the first of a series of pieces shares his thoughts on the Apollo House occupation.

Firstly before I continue I want to state categorically that I am very heartened by the time, effort and enthusiasm shown by the grassroots activists volunteering within the Apollo House occupation.

I know many on a personal basis, albeit it from within the Republican community in Dublin, and an assortment of other campaigns I’ve been involved with over the years. And even some friends neither normally interested in politics nor volunteering have given their all to this snap response to an ever-worsening homeless crisis engulfing the capital and many of our regional cities.

I want it to be known that that I respect all those involved for just reasons, and that I support the basis of this Home Sweet Home campaign.

In saying that I’m sure I will still be subjected to a barrage of reactionary comments that centre around that I’m a ‘begrudger’, ‘keyboard warrior’ and in some cases ‘karma will visit you’ as more than one Facebook commentator was seen to exclaim on social media.

It can be extremely hard to relay constructive criticism and engage critical thinking around the matter as there is much hysteria around such an event. It's positive hysteria but hysteria none the less.

There is no question there is a severe housing emergency in this State, particularly in the Capital.

Social Housing is scarce, with nothing concrete coming from housing minister Simon Coveney other then the selling off of public land, which in the past were council estates, now being sold to private developers to build lavish residences which former residents in that community cannot afford.

Private housing is limited with landlords exploiting the situation charging upwards of 1600

for a modest two-bedroom house or apartment in many working-class communities and suburban areas on the outskirts of the city.

To add insult to injury many of these landlords - who range from the absentee landlord with an extra house handy that they bought during the ‘boom’ period, to the vulture funds buying up entire apartment complexes and charging extortionate unaffordable rent through management firms - are engaging in widespread discrimination against potential tenants based on their means, number of children they have, single mothers and social welfare recipients: all despite legislation that was enacted early last year supposedly to combat the ‘Rent Allowance not accepted’ culture among landlords.

Evictions are commonplace, soulless banks forcing families from their long-term homes with the aid of the court system which now seems to be a nothing but the legal arm of these banks and suspect lending institutions.

Gentrification. The list goes on ...

It is in this climate that many find themselves homeless through no fault of their own. They are joining the ranks of the rough sleepers, a demographic that has always been present on Irish Streets throughout this State’s history not just in recent times (although there is a visible increase in the last few years).

I myself have experienced first-hand how utterly anxiety inducing and miserable it is to be stuck in the renting nightmare, having moved something like 5 times in the last 6 years with no certainty of whether your children will have a roof over their heads or of where to money is going to come from to pay next month’s ever increasing rental rates.

Weirdly in contrast to the Anti-Water Tax movement which captured the hearts and minds of hundreds of thousands of ordinary men and women and awakened a sense of rebellion long dormant in the Irish psyche, the housing crisis has not animated the masses even though the prospect of not having a roof over your head is a far more daunting reality then being annoyed at having to pay a bill for water charges.

I myself have recently gotten involved in a local housing action group and it unlike some other more popular campaigns it can be hard going and from what I’ve seen from similar initiatives in other communities, it seems to be the same story.

The housing issue is only going to get worse and more people will sleep on the cold streets. People aren’t taking to the streets in protest despite the necessity of doing so.

There is a dire need for an effective National Housing campaign, but for there to be a campaign of this nature some very revolutionary ideas and solutions need to be adopted. Frankly the explication of these solutions are the only long term and short term remedy for housing.


This includes:

The immediate building on a large scale nationwide of Social Housing
More regulation and scrutiny of the landlord class

More rights and protections for those facing the threat of evictions

More investment and protection of current Social Housing

The utilisation of vacant properties, particularly Nama properties and empty council houses sitting idle
Most importantly, enshrining the right to a home in the states constitution, something sadly lacking even after the centenary of the 1916 rising, even with all the pageantry the Enda Kenny and co indulged in.

The uncomfortable fact is it would tweak many to even suggest any of the above.

Then out of nowhere, came Apollo House and ‘Home Sweet Home’…………

Source: http://thepensivequill.am/2017/01/then-out-of-nowhere-came-apollo-house.html


Murky Waters of the Joint Oireachtas Committee on Water Funding

Watching officials from Irish Water, Ervia and the Commission for Energy Regulator duck questions at last week's meeting of the Joint Oireachtas Committee on Water Funding, in Leinster House, was like watching Pochards and Grebes diving and ducking in the murky waters at Inch Wildfowl Reserve, Co Donegal.  Now you see them, now you don’t. 

Irish Water was represented by Mr Jerry Grant (CEO), Ervia by Michael Mc Nicholas (CEO), Cathal Marley (Finance Dir). CER was represented by Paul McGowan (Commissioner) and Sheenagh Rooney (Dir of water).

       

Despite elaborate documents supplied by Irish Water and CER Committee members seemed to be having a hard time pinning down illusive and somewhat contradictory information.

At one point Jan O’ Sullivan, Lab,  added “We are not opposed to truth, we are a truth, truth committee and we need evidence before we can make decisions”.

She was supported by the chairman who told the officials “all we can do is have evidence provided and make decisions based on information that can be reasonably made available to us”

On another occasion David Cullinane, SF, requested a New Era report prepared for Government on funding options which the Expert Commission said was essential to complete an accurate assessment of financing options. He said that SF was refused an FOI request for the document but that a redacted version may be available in future. The Chairman Pádraig Ó Céidigh said he would request this report.

Below is a clip where Seamus Healy (Workers and Unemployed Action Group), like a good bloodhound, doggedly pursues the officials about the potential costs of metering just for excessive use and questions the economics. 

Mr Jerry Grant, Irish Water replied   “ we can only assess the costs when we know what the allowances and the tariffs are” .   A somewhat evasive answer.

 

Below in another clip,  we see Thomas Pringle trying to sniff out details from the officials such as whether a single utility can provide water at a lower cost than the previous 34 local authorities.  He asked"All you can actually say is that Irish Water has reduced it’s costs by 14% since 2014.”

Mr Jerry Mc Nicholas replied“we can absolutely say that we are providing it at a lower cost. What we can’t show is the quantum that the deputy is saying that that is by. We have looked at the benchmark going into 2014 based on 2013 costs and we know that we are delivering at less. We know we are delivering at less”

Absolutely muddying the waters again and no facts or figures in sight to back up the claim. Just for clarity when Mr Mc Nicholas refers to ‘quantum’ he possibly means ‘amount’ and ‘benchmark’ is probably ‘best performance’.

              Pádraig Ó Céidigh

Fundamental Flaw

Overall the lack of detail and adequate time for questions was not helped by Pádraig Ó Céidigh insisting on moving things along quickly. Each member of the 19 member committee was allocated approx 5 minutes question time.  This constraint and the fact that the committee has only until the end of February to deliberate and investigate, does not seem adequate for such a serious mater involving billions of euro as opposed to the amount of time and resources invested by both the Government and Irish Water to date.

However, a fundamental flaw in the whole process has to be the committee’s ‘terms of reference’.  This was highlighted in the following video clip when John Lahart, FF, was stopped in his tracks trying to ask about commercial charges and metering,  information anyone would believe an integral part of assessing funding and operational costs of Irish Water. 

Mr Jerry Grant dived for cover and evaded the question by appealing to the chair “non domestic charging”.  Immediately the Chairman Mr Ó Céidigh intervened and adamantly refused to let Mr Lahart ask the question.  Mr Ó Céidigh's reasoning was that of the 'terms of reference' of the committee.   “ It’s purely domestic charging, that’s our brief, that is the direction, me and you have been given. Go and read it.” he said.

 

Illogical terms of reference and only when it suits

Mr Ó Céidigh when he opened the meeting described the session as “We will now consider the funding, operation, maintenance and investment services in the water services.”

He ignored Paul McGowan’s (CER)  while reading out CER's submission which more than likely was also in it's written submission.  Mr McGowan read;

“We also provide economic regulation of Irish Water and this is essentially achieved by approving Irish Water’s proposed water charges plan. The essential elements of that are the approval of setting of a revenue cap that Irish Water is allowed to earn and how that translates into tariffs whether they be domestic tariffs or non-domestic tariffs. And also how that translates into a connection policy which domestic or non-domestic customers would pay for connections to Irish Water system.”

Another instance of the Chair looking the other way was during the very last question of the session from Fine Gael’s Martin Hayden.   Mr Hayden closed the meeting by asking“in relation to the figure of €232 million for the funding of Irish Water for 2017,  does that take account ongoing commercial water rates that were incoming.”  Ironically Mr Hayden was not brought to book for bringing up 'commercial charges'  but rather was supplied a 'Yes' answer.

 

Kate O’Connell Fine Gael

Contrived Manoeuver
Finally it may be a coincidence or maybe just a notion but it seemed that committee members, Kate O’Connell and Martin Hayden, both Fine Gael,  by the way,  had the first and last input of the session, respectively. 

One could easily be forgiven for concluding that it was a contrived manoeuvre.    A wily tactic maybe other members of the committee should consider especially when often times the first and last contributions are picked up by the media.

This show is going to be on the box i.e. Oireachtas media, for the next four weeks.  We think from watching the antics and especially Ms O’Connell, that it is going to be riveting viewing. Those medusa eyes are captivating and indeed would turn any opposition to stone.

 

Details about the Joint Committee:
http://www.oireachtas.ie/parliament/mediazone/pressreleases/2016/name-40119-en.html
http://www.oireachtas.ie/parliament/oireachtasbusiness/committees_list/futurefundingofdom

Viewing and video archives of Committee sessions:
https://oireachtas.heanet.ie/mp4/cr4/latest/
http://www.oireachtas.ie/parliament/watchlisten/watchlive/committeeroom4/