Peter B Collins news podcast from the West Coast of United States. Listen to some refreshing alternative news far away from the corporate media. From San Francisco, he brings you his views and analysis on important national and international issues, and interviews political leaders, journalists, authors and others who know more than he does.
Commission says ‘vast majority’ should no longer pay for water
Group says enshrining Irish Water in public ownership should be considered
Parteen Weir on Lough Derg. Photograph: Alan Betson
by Fiach Kelly
An allowance for domestic water use should be calculated on the basis of the number of people living in the home, the commission on water charges has said.
Under its proposals, the commission says the “vast majority” of people will no longer have to pay water charges.
The final report of the Expert Commission on Domestic Water Services will be published on Tuesday, earlier than expected.
It also says the commission is “satisfied” its recommendations will comply with European Union law and water directives.
The commission questions the rollout of water meters, which cost more than €500 million to install,and says that a referendum enshrining Irish Water in public ownership should be considered.
The final report says normal water usage for households should be paid through general taxation, with a charge being levied for “wasteful” usage.
“Water is essential for human life,” it says. “It is expensive to produce water for consumption, to treat wastewater, and to renew infrastructure. Therefore, water services must be paid for – through taxation, tariffs, or some combination of both.”
It adds, however: “Not having a specific charge for water does not mean that water does not have to be paid for by the citizen.
“Having considered various options and the background to the current situation, the Expert Commission has reached the conclusion that the optimal arrangement that should now be put in place is one that involves the funding of water services, for normal domestic and personal use, as a charge against taxation. The system should be predicated on an acceptance that access to adequate clean water for living requirements should not be determined by affordability.
“A distinction must, however, be made between a right to water for normal domestic and personal purposes and wasteful usage. The former can reasonably be regarded as a public service that should be funded out of taxation and which the State should provide for all citizens. Where water is used at a level above those normal requirements, that principle is no longer applicable and the user should pay for this use through tariffs.”
Each home will receive an allowance “that corresponds to the accepted level of usage required for domestic and personal needs. This allowance should be related to the number of persons resident in the household and adjusted for special conditions.”
Two options for determining normal use should be considered. One is that “the standard uses for domestic water consumption relate to personal washing, toilet flushing, drinking, cooking, clothes washing, dishwashing, waste disposal, and house cleaning”.
“A more detailed analysis should be carried out to establish the precise levels of allowance to be made available, based on analysis of consumption patterns for different occupancy households.”
Another approach would be to “ determine the level of water required for normal domestic and personal needs by reference to current per capita usage adjusted to reflect estimated excessive or wasteful use”.
“On this model, an allowance could be set at a level that corresponds to the actual consumption of a significant proportion of water users (say, for illustrative purposes, 80-90 per cent of users or at, say, 150 per cent of average domestic consumption). The allowance could be regularly reviewed and, if necessary, adjusted to reflect changes in water use patterns in Ireland. ”
On the issue of water meters, it says: “While benefits have accrued from the metering programme already undertaken in detecting leaks and monitoring patters of water usage, the question of whether to continue the metering programme in one of policy and is outside the Expert Commission’s terms of reference. If it is decided to proceed with the metering programme, consideration should be given to an approach that is more aligned with the proposals in this report, with a focus on district meters, metering of buildings in the case of multi occupancy, or metering of households on request.”
It also raises the prospect of higher taxes to pay for this method of funding of water services.
“The recommended funding model, if implemented, will place the main burden of financing the operational costs of providing domestic water services on the exchequer to be paid for through taxation. The question of whether there should be a dedicated tax, a broadly-based fiscal instrument, or an adjustment to existing taxes to fund this requirement would be a matter of budgetary policy and outside the scope of this report, but is worthy of further consideration.”
Special exemptions for those with medical conditions and others who require “high water usage should be maintained”.
Source: Irish Times, Nov 29, 2016
'Last battle': On Contact visits Standing Rock resistance in North Dakota
Environmental activists and Native Americans from 200 tribes are waging a determined last-ditch battle to stop the construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline. Chris Hedges, host of RT America’s On Contact, visited the water protectors’ resistance camp.
Thousands of protesters are camping out near Cannon Ball, North Dakota, facing off against police, private security contractors, and the Army Corps of Engineers. The company behind the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) intends to run the pipes under Lake Oahe, an artificial lake created by the Army on the Missouri River – and the Standing Rock Sioux Nation’s sole source of drinking water.
“Go back to when we were put on reservations,” Kandi Mossett, an activist with the Indigenous Environmental Network, told Hedges. “The Standing Rock tribe never ceded this land.”
Among the many Native American banners, several upside-down US flags are flying over the encampment. Mossett explained they symbolized the Natives’ distress.
“We have been in distress out here ever since we’ve been attacked by the police and the military for simply saying, ‘No, we do not want a pipeline underneath our drinking water source,’ and on our unceded treaty territory,” she said.
North Dakota Native Americans have been fighting hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, since 2008, when drilling began at Bakken shale fields. The oil boom brought thousands of workers to the state, disrupting local communities. Women and children no longer feel safe, because of the oil workers who live in “man camps,” Mossett said.
The land has suffered, too. An oil spill of over a million gallons in July of 2014 contaminated the upper flow of the Missouri. “Nothing is growing there, whatever that water touched,” Mossett says.
The Standing Rock Nation and its allies worry that when Dakota Access ruptures – not if, but when – it will affect not just the waters of Lake Oahe, but up to 80 million Americans living downstream.
The $3.8 billion pipeline, which is being constructed by Energy Transfer Partners, would transport 470,000 barrels of crude oil from the Bakken fields through three other states to a refinery in Illinois.
“It seems like what they want to do is just get the pipe in the ground and deal with whatever later,” Mossett said.
Native Americans and environmental activists have been building broad alliance against Dakota Access, seeking to replicate the success of the fight against the TransCanada Keystone XL, another pipeline endangering indigenous reservations.
Racism is a “powerful instrument that is being used to divide people,” Tom Goldtooth of the Indigenous Environmental Network told Hedges. To counter this, the activists built a “Cowboy-Indian alliance” against Keystone, partnering with the farmers and ranchers in Nebraska.
The struggle in North Dakota has become “a model of resistance that will be replicated throughout the US, especially under a Trump presidency, against the hegemonic power of corporations and a democratic system that has become too anemic to carry out reforms – especially environmental reforms – that will protect the planet,” said Hedges.
“This is the last battle in the struggle against colonization – not only of people, but of the Earth. It is a battle indigenous communities have been fighting for over four centuries,” Hedges added. “If they lose, we all lose. If they win, we make possible life itself.”
Source: RT, Nov 28