Controversy over Irish Water's boil water notices due to presence of Trihalomethanes

March 31, 2016

Paul Melia's article in the Irish Independent Mar 31, 2016 '250,000 homes face boil-water notices, Irish Water warns', is really what it is, a warning from Irish Water. What you have to do with this article isread between the lines. It is actually saying "don't abolish Irish Water otherwise you are all going to die, well maybe those in the 250,000 homes which are serviced from 470 crap plants throughout the country, spewing out cryptosporidiums .

Don't you get the feeling from the article that the timing of Irish Water's revelations is a bit opportunistic? Looking over their shoulder are Fianna Fail, Sinn Fein, AAA/PBP, SD, Independents and Independent Alliance TDs (incidentally not the Greens) and they are going to abolish this overpriced quango.

Mr Melia's facts and figures are mesmerising, well baffling really. One would need a calculator, an Irish Water one, to work it all out. Whatever number of Irish Water plants are not fit for purpose, would 6 water test's per year be adequate? Every day would be more like it.

Irish Water are worried about getting the heave-ho so they are making sure they are going to scare the living daylights out of the Irish people. They are warning you that if you don't want to get sick or worse then they are the only act in town. From what they are saying you would think that the Irish would have become an extinct species by this stage, foiled by the minute cryptosporidium bug. Anyway Irish Water' s experts have found all this out in the nick of time and by the way they have a €3.5 billion investment plan to put everything right. In the meantime Irish Water have issued boil water notices throughout the country. The steam will be rising in every house in the country.

Failure to disclose

What the Irish Water experts and Mr Melia investigation failed to disclose is that Irish Water are using the cheapest filtration system in all their plants. This system incorporates the dumping of thousands of tonnes of chlorine into to the water. It this chemical additive that causes 'trihalomethanes', a group of chemicals including chloroform a deadly carcinogen.

This article 'Boiling what? Controversy over boil water notices due to presence of Trihalomethanes' from greennews.ie is a short synopsis of the issues. But then again Irish Water knows all this.

Greennews.ie
‘Boil water’ notices that were issued to Irish water consumers are being met with fresh scrutiny, with fears that boiling water could increase the potency of certain harmful chemicals. The chemicals at the centre of the controversy are Trihalomethanes (THM’s), which are toxic compounds that occur in water due to the reaction of organic chemicals, when chlorine is added as a disinfectant. Environmental NGO ‘Friends of the Irish Environment (FIE) previously called on Irish water to inform consumers of the health risks associated with exposure to THM’s, which include the development of certain cancers, harm to the central nervous system, and miscarriage among pregnant women.

While the European Ombudsman ruled that Irish water could not be forced to provide information on THM’s to consumers, there is concern that consumers may be boiling THM infested water. This is due to a large number of ‘boil water’ notices that were issued to consumers across the country, due to the presence of cryptosporidium in the water. One example is in Galway, where ‘boil water’ notices remain in place in the area’s of Williamstown, Loughrea, Carraroe, and Tiernee/Lettermore.

A paradoxical situation has emerged, whereby consumers may be avoiding risk of exposure to cryptosporidium by boiling their water, but may be increasing their risk of exposure to THM’s. As FIE director Tony Lowes states: ”Boiling water that contains high level of THM’s creates an imminent danger to public health because the volatile chemicals are released and absorbed by the skin and through inhalation at a rate 5-15 times faster than drinking the water”.

Paul Murphy Anti Austerity Alliance responds to Irish Water's legal threat to politicians

March 30, 2016

Paul Murphy, Anti Austerity Alliance responds to Irish Water's legal threat that "Legal opinion commissioned by the utility company says the State is required under EU law to keep the contentious regime in place.... In our opinion, the Irish State is obliged to continue to impose charges for domestic water services.”

The advice – from Irish Water's solicitors Garrett Simons and Michael M Collins – argues that there is no option under European law to return to the practice of not charging for water. The Irish Times, March 29, 2016. see full article here.

Mr Murphy's statement

The report that Irish Water commissioned a legal opinion after the general election which argues ‘that there is no option under European law to return to the practice of not charging for water’ is deeply troubling. It is not troubling for the finding, which is dubious at best, but for the fact that the tops of Irish Water are so blatantly engaged in trying to subvert the democratically expressed wishes of the people to abolish Irish Water and water charges.

Almost 70% of people voted for parties that claimed to be committed to the abolition of Irish Water in the General Election. In response, Irish Water has engaged in a desperate rear-guard action to try to maintain itself. This legal opinion and the leaking of it to the Irish Times forms part of it. It is designed to pressure the political parties who could form the next government to forget the election promises made, for example the promise made by Fianna Fail to abolish Irish Water.

Irish Water is a loss-making, publicly funded entity. They should not be engaging in throwing away yet more public money to engage in an overtly anti-democratic intervention to try to deny the clearly expressed wishes of people for abolition.

In terms of the reported finding, it seems very questionable. Article 9.4 of the Water Framework Directive provides that countries don't have to implement water charges"if they decide in accordance with established practices not to apply" them. Tomorrow the government could abolish water charges and they could let the EU Commission know that, in accordance with long established practices in Ireland, they won't be attempting to apply water charges any more.

In the event that the Commission decided this was a breach of the Directive, they would be very openly going against the expressed wishes of people in a general election. Any bullying from them on water charges should be stood up to. For the moment, however, this is simply an intervention designed by the tops of Irish Water to save that failed entity. The best response by people is to strengthen the boycott and build for a massive united demonstration.

Murphy responds on newstalk.com

Below is a podcast from News on newstalk.com, Mar 29, 2016. Paul Murphy TD says Irish Water is "engaged desperately in a rearguard action to try and defend themselves"

Irish Water's massive media offensive designed to influence political opinion a week before D-Day.

March 29, 2016

By James Quigley

Does anyone notice how the Irish Times is churning out articles lately in support of Irish Water and their controversial water charges? Certainly for a newspaper these particular issues are topical especially given the present political uncertainty in the country and how the very existence of Irish Water is at stake. it is no wonder that some very influential parties are worried and it would be no surprise that they would use influence to protect their interests. Now that things are hotting up in the political arena where parties and Independent TDs are jostling for power in a quest to form a new government, there might just be other motives at play here.

Political uncertainty in Ireland has arisen out of the public's opposition to Irish Water and water charges. This opposition was demonstrated in the results of the Irish General Election on February 26th, 2016. Support for the former Fine Gael/Labour coalition government collapsed and it went instead to parties and independents opposing austerity, corruption and supporting the abolition of Irish Water, water charges.

The incredible story of this election was how well Fianna Fail did especially since it was crushed at the last election. It is the view of many that this success was in now small measure due to it's policy priorities on Irish Water.

Irish Times Articles

Reading the Irish Times articles, a person could be forgiven for thinking that there is some type of agenda at play. Could the media and interested parties be trying to influence political decisions? Certainly Irish Water, at present, is very worried about their very existence. This would probably be enough for the company to do all it can to protect itself. And what better way to stamp it's influence than through the media. It wouldn't be the first time for newspapers to be used in this way after all 'the pen is mightier than the sword'. Here's a quote from the Irish Times' first editorial after the 1916 Rising,

“the surgeon's knife has been put to the corruption in the body of Ireland, and its course must not be stayed until the whole malignant growth has been removed... Sedition must be rooted out of Ireland once for all” Irish Independent, 'Out of step: Dublin newspapers' reaction to the Rising', Feb. 18th 2016.

Although not as blood thirsty as the 1916 editorial quite a few of the more recent Irish Times articles involving Irish Water seem to be bias in their attack against opposition . Maybe the reporters and contributors are right and are only voicing common sense. Perhaps there is nobody in the opposition camp that has the ability to voice any credible argument against their sound economic plans . Or could it be 'money counts' and 'he who pays the piper calls the tune'? Certainly Irish Water has plenty of clout, a seemingly never ending supply of money and what seems to be a squadron of enthusiastic artist ready and willing to blow it's horn.

Political State of Play

We are now just over a month since the Irish General Election which took place on February 26th, 2016. See graphic below for results. Thirty two days later and we still have no Government. There has been one inconclusive vote held for a Taoiseach and the final crunch vote comes next week on April 6th .

Fine Gael, Labour, Green Party and some Independents support Irish Water. Fianna Fail, Sinn Fein, Anti Austerity Alliance/People Before Profit, Social Democrats and some Independents oppose water charges and Irish Water.

None of the major parties on their own can form a government and realistically the options are limited. The two right wing parties Fine Gael (FG) and Fianna Fail (FF) are in the driving seat but neither can form a government without support from other parties, Independents or each other.
Round one of talks with Independents have already taken place and round two takes place during this week. It is looking like neither FG or FF on their own can gather enough support to reach 79 seats for an overall majority.
FG and FF could form a grand ultra right wing majority coalition. No doubt this would be the preferred option of the establishment and some party members. However, there still remains an entrenched animosity or rivalry between these parties and having tasted power individually neither want to relinquish it. Also with a choice of establishment parties such as FG and FF there was always the illusion of democracy. It is because of this that some type of minority FG led government is the most likely. In order to achieve this FG will have to do a deal with FF and it is looking like FG's Universal Social Charge policy and FF's anti Irish Water and position on water charges policy are going to be the main bargaining chips. Will it be so long people, all you who voted for our red line issue, the abolition of Irish Water?

Sinn Fein can not be let off the hook lightly. With 24 seats they have quite a bit of say. Theoretically they couldwield a balance of power and could prevent a total right wing government. This could be done by them forming a coalition with so called fellow republicans Fianna Fail. This scenario seems unlikely since SF categorically refuses to talk with FF. They see themselves as socialists and they do not want to prop up a right wing party. However, to the layman's eye this stance seems rigid, it looks like principles before people or party before country. This is an option former Fianna Fail Tanaiste Mary Couglan, believed possible when she said “ a coalition deal with Sinn Fein in Government could work if they wanted it to.” Irish Mirror, March 21st , 2016'Fianna Fail can go into power with Sinn Fein'

Will Fianna Fail do a deal and renege on their manifesto core priority of abolishing Irish Water and ending water charges? It seems Irish Water and the Irish Times thinks so and they are both moving in for the kill.

Irish Times Onslaught

In many of the recent Irish Times articles there seems to be an emphasis on rubbishing any opposition to Irish Water. They present the company as a knight in shining armour and warn us of impending doom. Quite often the articles highlight the old decrepit water system run by 31 county councils as inefficient and cumbersome. The number 31 is mentioned often and we are constantly reminded that if we want pristine and healthy water then a modern centralised and cost effective agency is the only way to go.

Noel Dempsey
Irish Times Friday, March 25 'Noel Dempsey: Safe drinking water requires a national utility'.
Noel, an ex Fianna Fail environment minister, is a good catch for the any newspaper but he is writing in The Irish Times. He says himself that“I was the minister who negotiated the EU Water Framework Directive for Ireland. I opposed the compulsory imposition of water charges on Ireland”

Noel has since had a change of heart since he goes on“ We are now facing a situation where another generation will suffer inadequate infrastructure and unsafe water. A national utility is the only entity that can deliver the water system we deserve. Irish Water is the only game in town in relation to delivering quality water – primarily because so much investment has been put in place, with some significant achievements, that turning back now is neither cost-effective nor desirable.”

Cliff Taylor
In his article in The Irish Times, Sat, March 26th'A new brass plate on the door is no guarantee anything useful will happen' Cliff cynically weaves into his piece yarns that any opposition to Irish Water is somehow abnormal.

He tells us“Having taken the initial cost and done the work, calls to abolish Irish Water are a reversal of the normal demand to create an agency to solve a problem.”
Cliff continues “ Now we are pretending that abolishing an institution can make a problem better. Someone needs to arrange to fix our water supply and waste water and abolishing Irish Water and setting up some other lesser quango doesn't seem a very clever solution – handing it all back to the local authorities seems an even worse idea.”

Clever writers with subjective opinions but they do not surpass the latest Irish Times article “Water charges irreversible in EU law, say lawyers” Irish Times, March 29th, 2016 by Arthur Beesley. (because of Irish Times subscription charges the article can not be read onlinebut can be readhere Fliuch Off Irish Water)

This article is not really an opinion piece but rather it is what only could be described as propaganda, straight from the horses mouth. Irish Water has now entered the fray, directly and unashamedly. They have brought out the big guns in the form of their legal representatives, Garrett Simons and Michael M Collins.

Mr Beesley writes

“Legal opinion commissioned by the utility company says the State is required under EU law to keep the contentious regime in place. There is no possibility under European law for the State to suspend or scrap water charges, legal advisers have told Irish Water. Amid a deep political schism over the charges,. a legal opinion commissioned by the utility company says the State is required under EU law to keep the contentious regime in place.

The advice – from senior counsel Garrett Simons and Michael M Collins – argues that there is no option under European law to return to the practice of not charging for water.”

“The views of Irish Water have not been sought in political talks. However, the company will say in any engagements with political leaders that it sees no legal way of reversing course.”

That line was clever, a bit of reverse psychology. While saying that their advise was never sought they continue to advise political leaders and in addition, warn them of some nasty legal repercussions. It is not for nothing that Irish Water spend a fortune on public relations. I suppose that line alone could have cost a few grand.