Brussels and Geneva ban rollout of 5G for health reasons and call for investigation

In April 2019 Brussels and Geneva call for stop to 5G technology and questions the safety standards of wireless technology.

"I cannot welcome such technology if the radiation standards, which must protect the citizen, are not respected, 5G or not," Céline Fremault

Brussels, Environment minister Céline Fremault

Brussels

Last month Environment minister Céline Fremault (CDH) told Bruzz that the people of Brussels are not guinea pigs whose health can be sold at a profit. She told Bruzz that “A pilot project is not feasible with the current radiation standards”. see The Brussels Times


Antonio Hodgers, head of Counsel of State Geneva

Geneva

Meanwhile last week, Antonio Hodgers, the head of Geneva’s executive, announced a ban on the erection of further 5G mobile antennas in the canton, according to an interview on RTS.

le News reported “motivated by uncertainty on the potential health effects of the new technology, the temporary freeze is the most the cantonal government can do to stop the rollout of the technology. The governments of both Geneva and Vaud have now put the brakes on 5G rollout in their territories by putting a freeze on permits to erect further 5G antennas.”

Other Swiss cantons are following the developments in Vaud. A similar parliamentary motion has been put forward in Geneva and the parliament of Valais will discuss the issue when it next sits.

Sources:
The Brussels Times: http://www.brusselstimes.com/brussels/14753/radiation-concerns-halt-brussels-5g-for-now
Le News: https://lenews.ch/2019/05/02/geneva-blocks-the-erection-of-5g-mobile-antennas/


Paul Murphy in Brussels canvassing support for Jobstown Protesters

Paul Murphy in Brussels speaking to The European United Left/Nordic Green Left,  The GUE/NGL is a Confederal Political Group in the European Parliament and consists of 52 MEPs from 12 Member States

If for some strange reason you might not be acquainted with the JobstownNotGuilty case in Ireland, you can read details here 'Protesting is not a crime -Jobstown protesters' court case looming' .  

At home in Ireland you would imagine most people know about the Jobstown case and all the progressive forces are behind it giving their full support. 

However,  a cursory glance at web pages, facebook and twitter accounts of trade unions, left wing parties, R2W etc. you get the impression that the case is not rated highly. 

In fact there is a noticeable dearth of support.  This lack of home support is not only depressing, it is, in our view, symptomatic of agenda driven,  competitive politics of self interested, insular trade unions and political parties in Ireland today.  

Here we have a high profile case that the defense called “a recipe for totalitarianism" where a 17 year old youth has already been convicted of false imprisonment and it is only weeks until seven more protesters will be in the dock, a case about the right of assembly attacked by the full force of the State , the right to protest being criminalised, a case where a socialist TD and others were lifted in dawn raids and are now facing up to seven years in prison.

Where is the condemnation and solidarity? 

 

Support abroad

Belgium train drivers,

 

Pual Murphy, AAA TD, one of the #jobstownnotguilty accused,  was in Brussels last Wednesday speaking to @GUENGL , a European United Left group.  He wscanvassing support for the Jobstown case due to restart on 24th Aprilthis year.  

Mr Murphy, on his facebook page,  speaking about meeting MEPs said " I've already spoken with many and they're shocked that protesters are facing false imprisonment charges and understand it is clearly a threat to the right to protest."

They may very well be shocked but what about home support.  If we can't fight for our own rights how can we expect others to do it for us.
 

Home support

Trade Union & Socialist Coalition, TUSC, conference, England supporting JobstownNotGuilty

Some of the groups that have declared their support on JobstownNotGuilty's twitter or facebook pages, as far as we can see, aree.g Éirigí, Socialist Party, FINGALOL, R2WKillarney, SwordsSaysNoPopulist Watch Irl, Not4ur Entertainment,  construction branch of Unite trade union and of course all the many individual messages of support.

Unite Construction branch donation

However, we would like to be proved wrong and invite comments or go to JobstownNotGuilty pages and pledge your support.  Highlight the case in your own pages and also attend the forthcoming protests in Dublin


Irish fishermen ‘face wipe-out’ unless fishing rules changed

Analysis: Ireland should use Brexit as basis to to renegotiate EU fish policy, industry says

Fishing boats are seen in Cobh harbour in Co Cork. Fishermen’s representatives have called for a review of EU fishing rules. Photograph: Getty

by Lorna Siggins

Ireland’s fishing industry has breathed a sigh of relief, after Minister for Marine Michael Creed and his negotiating team in Brussels secured an overall six per cent increase for 2017 on last year’s share of quotas.

The outlook had been “dire”, as one representative said, with an initial 68 per cent cut in cod and nine per cent cut in prawns averted.

It was Creed’s first “red-eye” council, where EU fisheries ministers use sleep deprivation as a tactic to haggle for quotas for their fleets.

However, sleep may be in even shorter supply at such negotiations in years to come if Britain leaves the EU.

Oblivious to Brexit, fish know no boundaries, with some 40 different stocks moving between these two islands.

Creed acknowledged on RTÉ Radio’s Morning Ireland on Wednesday that British withdrawal would have a serious impact on the Irish fishing industry - “38 per cent of volume and 36 per cent of value of Irish fishing is in British territorial waters”, he said.

If Britain “attempts to establish a wall around their territorial waters”, this would pose “a significant challenge” he said.

“It would mean the entire fishing network will be displaced to a smaller area,” he said - as in Irish waters, already under severe pressure from Spanish, French and Dutch fleets.

“We will raise questions with the Commission about Ireland’s unique position,” he added, but industry organisations don’t believe the Government has given that “position” sufficient punch.

With 22 per cent of all EU waters off Irish coast, and just two per cent of EU fleet capacity to catch it, Killybegs Fishermen’s Organisation chief executive Sean O’Donoghue has stressed the urgency of taking a strong stand.

The Irish South and West Fish Producers Organisation, whose members have felt the impact for years of Spanish and French fleets, says Ireland should use Brexit to renegotiate the entire Common Fisheries Policy, or face a “wipe-out”.

There are already ominous rumblings about the near future. Britain did not support Ireland at the talks in defending the “Hague Preferences”, which recognise the particular case of coastal communities in allocating quotas.

Also, British Secretary of State James Brokenshire recently reasserted London’s claim over Lough Foyle in response to a parliamentary question in the House of Commons last month. After the Belfast Agreement peace deal, a cross-border body known as the Loughs Agency took responsibility for the Foyle, which was a key strategic naval base during the second world war.

The Department of Foreign Affairs immediately rejected Mr Brokenshire’s assertion that “the whole of Lough Foyle is within the UK.”

A recent Supreme Court decision held that Northern Ireland fishing vessels could not legally fish or harvest mussel seed in the Republic’s territorial waters - under an arrangement known as “voisinage”.

However, it is understood that the Government wants to introduce legislation which would effectively reverse the Supreme Court ruling. At a recent seafood conference hosted by Bord Iascaigh Mhara, British National Federation of Fishermen’s Organisations (NFFO) chief executive Barrie Deas forecast three possible scenarios in relation to Brexit.

The first was unilateral action by Britain to set its own quotas and control its own waters, the second involved bilateral and trilateral negotiations on shared stocks with coastal states, including Ireland and Norway.

The third was a move to a regional management structure by coastal states, a type of “super-regional advisory council”, expanding on the regional councils established as part of the revised Common Fisheries Policy, he said.

This latter scenario could benefit all EU coastal states, he suggested. The rights of coastal states to manage their own stocks - a type of regional management recognised in the most recent EU fish policy - is likely to gain greater currency as those stocks come under event greater pressure.

World demand for seafood is only going up, and the Irish industry is worth 1 billion euro in annual landings. However, foreign landings, transhipped back to Spain with no added value, are also on the increase here.

In an interview with The Irish Times in 1996, then EU fisheries commissioner Emma Bonino gave the most honest description of the community’s vision for “fewer, larger vessels”, spending longer periods of time at sea - such as the Dutch factory ships filmed in Irish waters for the recently released documentary Atlantic (italicss) directed by Risteard Ó Dómhnaill. This would fulfil the European Commission’s aim of providing cheaper fish for the consumer, but at the expense of coastal communities depending on the activity.

Birdwatch Ireland’s representative Sinéad Cummins, who was in Brussels for the fish talks, has urged EU ministers to think of the long term future of communities on the coastline by sticking to scientific advice - and allowing greater public access to the late night deliberations behind firmly closed doors.

Source: Irish Times, Dec 12 2016