Brother Obama

by  Fidel Castro,  on President Obama's visit to Cuba March 2016

We don’t need the empire to give us anything. Our efforts will be legal and peaceful, because our commitment is to peace and fraternity among all human beings who live on this planet.

The kings of Spain brought us the conquistadores and masters, whose footprints remained in the circular land grants assigned to those searching for gold in the sands of rivers, an abusive and shameful form of exploitation, traces of which can be noted from the air in many places around the country.

Tourism today, in large part, consists of viewing the delights of our landscapes and tasting exquisite delicacies from our seas, and is always shared with the private capital of large foreign corporations, whose earnings, if they don’t reach billions of dollars, are not worthy of any attention whatsoever.

Since I find myself obliged to mention the issue, I must add - principally for the youth - that few people are aware of the importance of such a condition, in this singular moment of human history. I would not say that time has been lost, but I do not hesitate to affirm that we are not adequately informed, not you, nor us, of the knowledge and conscience that we must have to confront the realities which challenge us. The first to be taken into consideration is that our lives are but a fraction of a historical second, which must also be devoted in part to the vital necessities of every human being. One of the characteristics of this condition is the tendency to overvalue its role, in contrast, on the other hand, with the extraordinary number of persons who embody the loftiest dreams.

Nevertheless, no one is good or bad entirely on their own. None of us is designed for the role we must assume in a revolutionary society, although Cubans had the privilege of José Martí’s example. I even ask myself if he needed to die or not in Dos Ríos, when he said, “For me, it’s time,” and charged the Spanish forces entrenched in a solid line of firepower. He did not want to return to the United States, and there was no one who could make him. Someone ripped some pages from his diary. Who bears this treacherous responsibility, undoubtedly the work of an unscrupulous conspirator? Differences between the leaders were well known, but never indiscipline. “Whoever attempts to appropriate Cuba will reap only the dust of its soil drenched in blood, if he does not perish in the struggle,” stated the glorious Black leader Antonio Maceo. Máximo Gómez is likewise recognized as the most disciplined and discreet military chief in our history.

Looking at it from another angle, how can we not admire the indignation of Bonifacio Byrne when, from a distant boat returning him to Cuba, he saw another flag alongside that of the single star and declared, “My flag is that which has never been mercenary...” immediately adding one of the most beautiful phrases I have ever heard, “If it is torn to shreds, it will be my flag one day… our dead raising their arms will still be able to defend it!” Nor will I forget the blistering words of Camilo Cienfuegos that night, when, just some tens of meters away, bazookas and machine guns of U.S. origin in the hands of counterrevolutionaries were pointed toward that terrace on which we stood.

Obama was born in August of 1961, as he himself explained. More than half a century has transpired since that time.

Let us see, however, how our illustrious guest thinks today:

“I have come here to bury the last remnant of the Cold War in the Americas. I have come here to extend the hand of friendship to the Cuban people,” followed by a deluge of concepts entirely novel for the majority of us:

“We both live in a new world, colonized by Europeans,” the U.S. President continued, “Cuba, like the United States, was built in part by slaves brought here from Africa. Like the United States, the Cuban people can trace their heritage to both slaves and slave-owners.”

The native populations don’t exist at all in Obama’s mind. Nor does he say that the Revolution swept away racial discrimination, or that pensions and salaries for all Cubans were decreed by it before Mr. Barack Obama was 10 years old. The hateful, racist bourgeois custom of hiring strongmen to expel Black citizens from recreational centers was swept away by the Cuban Revolution - that which would go down in history for the battle against apartheid that liberated Angola, putting an end to the presence of nuclear weapons on a continent of more than a billion inhabitants. This was not the objective of our solidarity, but rather to help the peoples of Angola, Mozambique, Guinea Bissau and others under the fascist colonial domination of Portugal.

In 1961, just one year and three months after the triumph of the Revolution, a mercenary force with armored artillery and infantry, backed by aircraft, trained and accompanied by U.S. warships and aircraft carriers, attacked our country by surprise. Nothing can justify that perfidious attack which cost our country hundreds of losses, including deaths and injuries

As for the pro-yankee assault brigade, no evidence exists anywhere that it was possible to evacuate a single mercenary. Yankee combat planes were presented before the United Nations as the equipment of a Cuban uprising.

The military experience and power of this country is very well known. In Africa, they likewise believed that revolutionary Cuba would be easily taken out of the fight. The invasion via southern Angola by racist South African motorized brigades got close to Luanda, the capital in the eastern part of the country. There a struggle began which went on for no less than 15 years. I wouldn’t even talk about this, if I didn’t have the elemental duty to respond to Obama’s speech in Havana’s Alicia Alonso Grand Theater.

Nor will I attempt to give details, only emphasize that an honorable chapter in the struggle for human liberation was written there. In a certain way, I hoped Obama’s behavior would be correct. His humble origin and natural intelligence were evident. Mandela was imprisoned for life and had become a giant in the struggle for human dignity. One day, a copy of a book narrating part of Mandela’s life reached my hands, and - surprise! - the prologue was by Barack Obama. I rapidly skimmed the pages. The miniscule size of Mandela’s handwriting noting facts was incredible. Knowing men such as him was worthwhile.

Regarding the episode in South Africa I must point out another experience. I was really interested in learning more about how the South Africans had acquired nuclear weapons. I only had very precise information that there were no more than 10 or 12 bombs. A reliable source was the professor and researcher Piero Gleijeses, who had written the text Conflicting Missions: Havana, Washington, and Africa, 1959-1976, an excellent piece. I knew he was the most reliable source on what had happened and I told him so; he responded that he had not spoken more about the matter as in the text he had responded to questions from compañero Jorge Risquet, who had been Cuban ambassador and collaborator in Angola, a very good friend of his. I located Risquet; already undertaking other important tasks he was finishing a course which would last several weeks longer. That task coincided with a fairly recent visit by Piero to our country; I had warned him that Risquet was getting on and his health was not great. A few days later what I had feared occurred. Risquet deteriorated and died. When Piero arrived there was nothing to do except make promises, but I had already received information related to the weapons and the assistance that racist South Africa had received from Reagan and Israel.

I do not know what Obama would have to say about this story now. I am unaware as to what he did or did not know, although it is very unlikely that he knew absolutely nothing. My modest suggestion is that he gives it thought and does not attempt now to elaborate theories on Cuban policy.

There is an important issue:

Obama made a speech in which he uses the most sweetened words to express: “It is time, now, to forget the past, leave the past behind, let us look to the future together, a future of hope. And it won’t be easy, there will be challenges and we must give it time; but my stay here gives me more hope in what we can do together as friends, as family, as neighbors, together.”

I suppose all of us were at risk of a heart attack upon hearing these words from the President of the United States. After a ruthless blockade that has lasted almost 60 years, and what about those who have died in the mercenary attacks on Cuban ships and ports, an airliner full of passengers blown up in midair, mercenary invasions, multiple acts of violence and coercion?

Nobody should be under the illusion that the people of this dignified and selfless country will renounce the glory, the rights, or the spiritual wealth they have gained with the development of education, science and culture.

I also warn that we are capable of producing the food and material riches we need with the efforts and intelligence of our people. We do not need the empire to give us anything. Our efforts will be legal and peaceful, as this is our commitment to peace and fraternity among all human beings who live on this planet.

Source: http://en.granma.cu/cuba/2016-03-28/brother-obama

Salmon eile - Government, IFA and multinational fish-farmers deny reality that typical farmed smoked salmon contained 10 chemical residues

by Tony Lowes, March 7, 2016

Asked if the limitations on chemical residues in farmed salmon set by our government and its agencies are adequate to protect health, Dr David Carpenter, Director, Institute for Health and the Environment at the University at Albany in the US, wrote in a personal communication to the Boycott Farmed Salmon Campaign that, “In my judgment many of them are not”.

Malachite is probably the most toxic of the ten chemicals. For more than ten years it has been know to cause carcinogenesis, mutagenesis, chromosomal fractures, teratogenecity and respiratory toxicity in some mammals including organ damage and mutagenic, carcinogenic and developmental abnormalities. All ten chemicals are recorded at levels below the Minimum Residue Level set by the Marine Institute and so are listed in the annual ‘Chemical Residues in Irish Farmed Finfish’ report as “compliant”.

Introduction

Last year the scalps of super-chef Darina Allen and super-foodie Sally McKenna were quietly obtained for the ‘Boycott Farmed Salmon’ Christmas campaign. The campaign quoted Slow Food International’s opposition to farmed salmon, specifically its ‘Not On My Plate’ listing of farmed salmon. Ballymaloe Cookery School’s Allen was President of Slow Food in Ireland and McKenna was involved in setting up a watered-down Slow Food ‘Snail’ marketing logo. After the campaign implied hypocrisy, Allen, a friend of Agriculture Minister Simon Coveney, somehow felt she should “step back’ from her role as President of Slow Food Ireland. McKenna’s Snail has vanished without a trail. However, both of the Irish food celebs continue to promote Irish ‘organic’ smoked salmon and its artisan producers, even if it suggests a double standard. Their lack of support for the boycott is not unexpected.

Malachite is probably the most toxic of the ten chemicals. For more than ten years it has been known to cause carcinogenesis, mutagenesis, chromosomal fractures, teratogenecity and respiratory toxicity in some mammals including organ damage

On the other end of the political rainbow, the campaign found an ally in the surprising form of Eamon DeValera’s grandson, Eamon O’Cuív, TD, the long-standing FF Galway Deputy – popular supporter of all things rural.
O’Cuív told the Oireachtas Agriculture Food and Fisheries Committee hearings in early December that he “will not touch farmed salmon because it is a totally unnatural product”, referring specifically to the use of chemicals. A story filed by Connacht Tribune reporter, Dara Bradley, accurately described the campaign’s highlighting of O’Cuív’s comments. But a banner-headlined feature on the front page: ‘TD wants farmed salmon boycott’. Toxicity-friendly phones in the west rang off their hooks before the ink was dry and an apology to the TD followed the next week. The canny O’Cuív felt he had been used by everyone. This time he was right.

The row was triggered by the publication by Boycott Farmed Salmon of a pre-slaughter chemical-residue test of typical ‘organic’ farmed salmon which listed ten chemicals. The ten chemicals include pesticides, food preservatives, dyes, and antibiotics. All of them are recorded at levels below the Minimum Residue Level allowable set by the Marine Institute and so are listed in the Annual ‘Chemical Residues in Irish Farmed Finfish’ Report as “compliant”.

Both the company involved, Marine Harvest, a Norwegian multinational that controls 80% of Irish farmed-salmon production and the IFA have issued denials. The comments tell an extraordinary tale and I include them serially after the relevant chemical summary.

 

This document is the Marine Institute’s Inspector’s record of 20 June 2012 of chemical residues testing undertaken by Marine Harvest on 3 September 2011 on a fully grown salmon about to be marketed. The product is certified organic under a 2009 EU Regulation supervised by the Minister for Agriculture, the competent authority for the sector, through the ‘The Standards for Organic Food and Farming in Ireland’.

The document was provided by the Marine Institute to the Information Commissioner after a 2012 failure by the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food to provide any records relating to chemical use on fish farms led to an appeal. The Marine Institute initially informed the Information Commissioner that they “held no relevant documents”, a statement which the Information Commissioner wrote “does not make any sense considering their legal obligations”.

In July 2014, the Department notified the Information Commissioner that it had “identified a number of records relevant which had been overlooked earlier”. The Information Commissioner’s ruling states:  “No explanation has been offered by the Department as to why these reports were not identified as relevant in response to the original or internal review requests, or indeed when my Office queried the issue in 2014”, concluding “the Department’s handling of the request falling short of what might reasonably be expected”.

Three pre-slaughter Residue Testing Inspection Reports were included in the ten Inspection Reports released. Marine Harvest and the IFA have denied that some of the chemicals listed are present (even though some of them are on the company’s list as approved for use on organic salmon). The IFA accused the Boycott Farmed Salmon campaign of an attempt “to ruin hundreds of jobs on Irish farms, processing plants, smokeries and shops in Ireland in the run up to Christmas each year”.

When asked about the results, The Department of Agriculture consulted the Marine Institute, its scientific advisor, which informed it that as the test results were undertaken for a private company, it would not be appropriate for it to comment – in spite of the fact that the record was created as part of the Marine Institute’s statutory regulatory role, by its own Inspector.

The Minister for Health, who controls the Food and Safety Authority, referred the matter back to the Minister for Agriculture.

THE 10 CHEMICALS

 

1: Emamectin benzoate

Top of the list because of the Irish connection must come the pesticide Emamectin benzoate, orally administered in fish food under veterinary prescription. It is sold under the trade name ‘Slice’ to paralyse the nervous system of the ectoparasite sea lice, a relative of the common head lice.

Long-standing concerns over this chemical have led to the banning from the food chain in the UK of horses treated with this product.

This biocide has been the mainstay against sea lice since salmon farms began. Sea lice are now the major biological problem facing the industry worldwide, according to Marine Harvest CEO Alf-Helge Aarskog, describing them as the “industry’s biggest challenge” when publishing the company’s 3rdquarter report.

The lice not only damage fish, leading to secondary infections and high mortality, but have a free-swimming stage in which they have been shown to infect wild salmon up to 30 kilometers distant, reducing dramatically the numbers which would otherwise return to their spawning ground.

However, a 2015 peer-reviewed scientific study shows that salmon lice have mutated, wherever they are found, across the globe in eleven years to resist this pesticide.  It classifies the chemical as a ‘mutagen’. As resistance was first reported from Ireland in 2005, the author of the study, Professor Kevin Glovers, says that “It is not unthinkable that the origin of the observed genetic changes was in Ireland”. Get out the green jersey.

Marine Harvest position: There is absolutely no scientific evidence whatsoever to support a claim that this product has led to lice ‘mutating’.
Irish Farmers Association position: Emamectin benzoate is an anti-sea-lice product which is authorised and has a permitted residue limit authorised by the EU and national authorities.
Marine Institute position: The residue testing data referred to derive from private testing carried out by the industry and the Institute is therefore unable to comment on the specifics of the results.

FACT: Marine Harvest offers no reason for ignoring Glovers’ 2014 research published in October 2014 in BMC Genomics 2014.  It was actually the first time that science had managed to simultaneously document that a mutation that arose in just one animal in the marine environment had spread to the whole population, and documented how long this process took (11 years).

Glovers was the corresponding author: he is principal scientist and research group leader for the population genetics group at Institute of Marine Research, Norway and a professor at the Sea lice Research Centre at the University of Bergen. The publication lists nine co-authors from three academic institutions in Norway and has never been challenged.
Marine Harvest’s ‘Medicine Positive list’, which lists chemicals approved for use by the company, including those permitted in their organic certified salmon production, states that no withdrawal period is required, in spite of the fact that this pesticide is banned in Canada, and a 60-day withdrawal period is required in the USA, to protect public health.

2: Deltamethrin

A pesticide used to create a bath to treat the same ectoparasite as Emamectin. The Product Data sheet issued by the manufacturer states: “This pesticide is toxic to fish and aquatic invertebrates. Do not apply directly to water, to areas where surface water is present, or to intertidal areas below the mean high water mark”.
Management of farmed salmon requires transfer by suction in pipes from the cages to ‘well boats’ filled with treated water which is discharged directly into the bay after use. Now used in combination with Emamectin as sea-lice resistance increases. (See #1)

The Aquaculture Stewardship Council [ASC] certification approval report on Marine Harvest’s salmon farm at Deenish, County Kerry, dated 05 March 2015, states that: “Lice levels on this site never reached the trigger levels for treatments”. This trigger level which requires mandatory treatment is based on an egg-bearing female’s winter-limit of two sea lice per fish. The ASC-required ‘Dashboard’ for this farm (covering the last two months) shows Almost five per fish in the first week of December 2015 – but only one of these was an egg-bearing female. Thus the trigger level was not exceeded – and no treatment was required under the state’s protocol, though the number of lice indicates an infestation of at least 170,000 lice per cage.

The record shows that the company appears itself to treat these infestations with pesticides, given that in this December 2015 example, the number of lice fell from 4.9 to 0.35 by the following week when – without intervention – they would be expected to increase.  Yet the organic standards state that for farmed salmon “The use of parasite treatments, not including compulsory control schemes operated by the Competent Authority, shall be limited to twice per year or once per year where the production cycle is less than 18 months”. These records show that Marine Harvest uses sea-lice treatments as a prophylactic, greatly increasing damage to the environment and also the resistance of the sea lice.

 

Marine Harvest position: Deltamethrin was not detected at all.
Irish Farmers Association position: The fish did not contain any Deltamethrin
Marine Institute position: The residue testing data referred to are on foot of private testing carried out by the industry and the Institute is therefore unable to comment on the specifics of the results.

FACT: Delatmethrine is approved for use on organic fish on Marine Harvest’s Medicine Positive List.

3: Tricaine mesilate [MS222]

Tricaine mesilate is an anaesthetic used under veterinary prescription to anaesthetise fish for handling during the suction transferring to well boats for pesticide bath treatment or other procedures. It is reported as present on the premises of every operation inspected in the ten files released, with one reporting it was kept in the glove-compartment of a van. In fact, Marine Harvest’s storage of MS222 in Castletownbere, County Cork, was found by one Inspector to be inadequate and the company was required to install locks on the office storage cupboard (which it subsequently did). Given its wide usage and essentially benevolent purpose (in the circumstances) it is inexplicable why its presence is denied. It is sold in aquarium shops for the painless euthanasia of fish.

 

Marine Harvest position: MS222 was not detected at all.
Irish Farmers Association position: The fish did not contain any MS222.
Marine Institute position: The residue-testing data referred to are on foot of private testing carried out by the industry and the Institute is therefore unable to comment on the specifics of the results.

FACT: Marine Harvest’s Medicine Positive List lists Tricaine mesilate [MS222] as permitted for organic fish and it is present (below the MRL) on all three reports on residue tests provided to the Information Commissioner by the Marine Institute.

4: Oxytetracycline

This antibiotic is used in human medicine. It is used (under prescription) by salmon farms to treat furunculosis, first confirmed in Ireland in 1985 and now considered endemic. The disease results in gross boils, and is transmitted through the water column, direct contact, and vectors such as birds or sea lice. It is also used to treat secondary infections caused by the increasingly frequent jelly fish attacks and sea lice infestations.

The World Health Organisation (WHO) classified Oxytetracycline in 2009 as “Critically Important Antimicrobials for Human Medicine”. These are defined a “used as sole therapy or one of few alternatives to treat serious human disease” including in this case Lyme disease, brucellosis, and pneumonia. WHO is seeking to restrict the use of this antibiotic on animals “in order to preserve their effectiveness in human medicine”.

McDonalds USA announced in March 2015 that it will no longer source food from suppliers who use human antibiotics on their animals, stating that, “Our vision for antimicrobial stewardship is preserving antimicrobial effectiveness in the future through ethical practices today”.

Marine Harvest position: Oxytetracycline was not detected at all.
Irish Farmers Association position: The fish did not contain any Oxytetracycline.
Marine Institute position: The residue testing data referred to is on foot of private testing carried out by the industry and the Institute is therefore unable to comment on the specifics of the results.

FACT: Oxytetracycline is permitted for use on organic fish according to Marine Harvest’s ‘Medicine Positive List’.

5: Oxytetracycline Ethoxyquin
6: Ethoxyquin DMK

Ethoxyquin is an anti-oxidant added to the increasingly lengthy animal food chain to prevent spontaneous combustion because refrigeration is “prohibitively expensive” for animal feed transport. Ethoxyquin is ‘authorised’, but only in the animal food chain. Crossover to the human food chain is an increasing concern. In 2015 the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration detected the presence of ethoxyquin in multiple krill-oil products, augmenting concerns that there may have been contamination of other Omega 3 fish products.

A worldwide consumer-driven trend to eliminate a variety of artificial preservatives, flavours and colours, such as Ethoxyquin, from our foods has led to companies like Nestlé USA, Hershey’s, MARS and General Mills eliminating or committing to eliminate many chemicals – and specifically Ethoxyquin.

Recent reconsideration by the European Food Safety Authority [EFSA] of ethoxyquin MRL, published on 18 November 2015, states: “Considering the data gaps in the available studies, no safe dietary level for fish, including salmonids, can be derived”.  This finding does not appear to have been addressed in Ireland yet.

Marine Harvest position: BHA and Ethoxyquin/Ethoxyquin Dimer are simply antioxidants found in fishmeal and fish oil (feed ingredients).  These were reported at barely detectable levels.
Irish Farmers Association position: BHA and Ethoxyquin are permitted antioxidants found in fishmeal and fish oil (feed ingredients) necessary for the prevention of spontaneous combustion in fishmeal and oils transported by sea. These were permitted antioxidants in 2011 and again at barely detectable levels.
Marine Institute position: The residue testing data referred to are on foot of private testing carried out by the industry and the Institute is therefore unable to comment on the specifics of the results.

FACT: Ethoxyquin is ‘permitted’ for use only in animal feed ingredients and should not be present in the human food chain.

7: BHA (butylated hydroxyanisole)

Anti-oxidants like Ethoxyquin, BHA and BHT are, however, permitted in food products to extend shelf life, in spite of the fact that the US National Institutes of Health reported that BHA is “reasonably anticipated to be a human carcinogen” based on evidence of carcinogenicity in experimental animals – such as rats. Critics point out that it does this exclusively in the forestomach, an organ that humans don’t have.
Controversy surrounds the use of BHA and BHT, with some proponents suggesting the same antioxidant effects that BHA has on fats (scavenging free radicals) can also neutralise the threat of other carcinogens.
Vitamin E – tocopherols – are a natural alternative and are likely to be the preservative used in food, particularly those labelled ‘organic’, marketed in health-food shops.

Marine Harvest position: OBHA and Ethoxyquin/Ethoxyquin Dimer are simply antioxidants found in fishmeal and fish oil (feed ingredients).  These were reported at barely detectable levels.
Irish Farmers Association position: BHA and Ethoxyquin are permitted antioxidants found in fishmeal and fish oil (feed ingredients) necessary for the prevention of spontaneous combustion in fishmeal and oils transported by sea. These were permitted antioxidants in 2011 and again at barely detectable levels.
Marine Institute position: The residue testing data referred tare on foot of private testing carried out by the industry and the Institute is therefore unable to comment on the specifics of the results.

FACT: Ethoxyquin is permitted only as an additive to animal feed and should not ‘cross-over’ into the human food chain. The ‘Organic Farming and Food Standards in Ireland’ list for approved use only permit “Natural antioxidant substances” with the “use restricted to feed for aquaculture”. Ethoxyquin is not a natural anti-oxidant substance.

8: BHT Butylated hydroxytoluene

The chemical cousin to BHA, BHT is another anti-oxidant. See above.

Marine Harvest position: The results in question show that BHT was not detected at all.
Irish Farmers Association position: The fish did not contain any BHT.
Marine Institute position: The residue testing data refered to is on foot of private testing carried out by the industry and the Institute is therefore unable to comment on the specifics of the results.

FACT: The “barely detectable levels” Marine Harvest admits for BHA are <0.3 ug/kg. BHT is recorded as <0.4 ug/kg. it is utterly illogical for Marine Harvest to characterise a <0.3 result as a “barely detectable level” while claiming that a <0.4 reading for BHT shows that BHT was “not detected at all”.

9: Malachite green
10: leuco malachite green dyes

Salmon are pink for the same reason flamingos are pink: their diets are heavy in krill and shrimp. Denied their natural diet of krill and shrimp, farmed salmon’s flesh is grey and unappetising. The deepest orange is associated with wild Alaskan salmon whose diet in the Baltic Sea is predominantly krill, whereas North Atlantic salmon are a pink so distinct that Crayola have named a colour after it – “salmon pink”.

Dyes have been a subject of controversy since King Edward I issued the first food-adulteration regulation in 1300 banning ground bones used for whitening flour. Malachite is also used as a local antiseptic and was widely used by the fish breeding industry to control the fungus Saprolegnia, a water mould that kills the eggs and young fry.
Traces of malachite green which the Marine Institute’s 2011 Residues Reports state is “illegal” are, consequently, inexplicable. The 2008 EU Regulations give a “Reproductive Toxicity Warning:  Suspected of damaging fertility or the unborn child”, with a further Warning that it is “very toxic to aquatic life”, and an “acute hazard with long-lasting effects”.

The Marine Institute’s last report of this chemical (above the MRL) was in 2006, leading the 2014 Chemical Residues Reports to claim that “Recent results suggest that as a result of increased industry awareness that it is an unauthorised substance, supported by monitoring and enforcement, the use of malachite green has ceased”.
In fact concern over dyes in salmon are indirectly acknowledged by the Marine Institute’s upgrading in September 2014 to enable a new validated analytical method “to expand testing to cover a broader suite of dyes”. The MRL for malachite was lowered from 1.0 to 0.5 ug/kg at the same time.

After a 2003 lawsuit in the United States, all farmed salmon that is dyed was required to state on the packaging that it containa “added colouring”. This has since been tightened to require the identification of the dye in question, albeit through a complex code system.

There is no regulation in Ireland requiring organic salmon to declare if dyes have been used in their production, or what those dyes are.

Marine Harvest position: The results in question show that Malachite Green and Leuco Malachite was not detected at all.
Irish Farmers Association position: The fish did not contain any Malachite Green.
Marine Institute position: The residue testing data referred to are on foot of private testing carried out by the industry and the Institute is therefore unable to comment on the specifics of the results.

FACT:  Once again, the readings for malachite – <0.5 ug/kg – which was “not detected at all” are higher than the readings for BHA – <0.3 ug/kg – which Marine Harvest admits indicates BHA is “present”. Malachite is probably the most toxic of the ten chemicals. For more than ten years it has been know to cause carcinogenesis, mutagenesis, chromosomal fractures, teratogenecity and respiratory toxicity in some mammals, including organ damage, mutagenic, carcinogenic and developmental abnormalities.

The ‘Organic Farming and Food Standards in Ireland’ are silent on the use of dyes in organic foods.

Source: http://villagemagazine.ie/index.php/2016/03/salmon-eile/

More Bad News About Water Safety Could Affect Millions of Americans

 

New research suggests that industrial chemicals in public drinking water have exceeded federal safety levels for 6 million Americans.

A study just released by two departments at Harvard University reported that unacceptable levels of polyfluoroalkyl and perfluoroalkyl chemicals (PFASs)—linked to a host of ailments including cancer, obesity and hormone disruption—are circulating in the nation’s drinking water supply.

Here’s more from the research team’s findings, as reported in a news release from the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health:

“For many years, chemicals with unknown toxicities, such as PFASs, were allowed to be used and released to the environment, and we now have to face the severe consequences,” said lead author Xindi Hu, a doctoral student in the Department of Environmental Health at Harvard Chan School and Environmental Science and Engineering at SEAS. “In addition, the actual number of people exposed may be even higher than our study found, because government data for levels of these compounds in drinking water is lacking for almost a third of the U.S. population—about 100 million people.”

The study found that PFASs were detectable at the minimum reporting levels required by the EPA in 194 out of 4,864 water supplies in 33 states across the U.S. Drinking water from 13 states accounted for 75% of the detections, including, in order of frequency of detection, California, New Jersey, North Carolina, Alabama, Florida, Pennsylvania, Ohio, New York, Georgia, Minnesota, Arizona, Massachusetts, and Illinois.

Read the full study, released Tuesday, here.