Floods, trolleys and the politics of fear

Real problems fester for decades, while the chancers stage another political panto, writes Gene Kerrigan

Cartoonist: Tom Halliday

Cartoonist: Tom Halliday

Deep in all our hearts, we know the floods will come again, and again, down through the years to come.

Deep in all our hearts, we know the chaos in A&E will persist through the winter and into the spring and it will be there when winter returns.

The A&E crisis is a late 20th-century problem. The parade of promises to provide effective flood defences go back to before most of us were born.

Meanwhile, there will be an election - and these are the things that elections are supposed to be about. The safety of our homes; the protection of our health.

Deep in all our hearts, we know the probability is that we'll elect chancers and careerists again, as we have done at every opportunity.

Despite knowing that the problems that beset us cannot be solved by chancers and careerists.

Chancers and careerists have spent their lives figuring out how to manipulate our local loyalties. They know we're hoping that someone local will get to the cabinet table, and maybe bring back some goodies for the constituency.

Maybe if we elect the right chancer, or the right careerist, a post office or a police station will be spared from closure. Nationally, they know how to manipulate our hope for a wee tax cut.

They know, above all, how to manipulate our fear of change.

And because we vote according to our local hopes and our national fears, we elect the chancers and the careerists again and again. And decade follows decade, nothing effective is done, and the flood waters rise once more and break the hearts of people who prayed it would never happen again.

Two months from now, it will be 10 years since Mary Harney, then Minister for Health, declared the A&E crisis to be a national emergency. For years, it had merely been a crisis. Now, it was an emergency.

It was an emergency back then, in March 2006, because there were no fewer than 384 patients on trolleys, according to the nurses. The HSE said there was just 314.

Last week, the nurses counted 516 people on trolleys and no one dared question that figure.

And Leo Varadkar, the current Minister for Prolonging the National Emergency, was patting himself on the back. Because a year ago, the figure was 563. This is now the measure of success.

In 2006, following the declaration of a national emergency, the HSE promised that by the following year, the target for the maximum A&E waiting time would be six hours. The target these days is nine hours.

Treating someone who's waited a full nine bloody hours in A&E is now a measure of success. Again and again, targets are missed and seriously ill people wait multiples of nine hours.

We're not two weeks into 2016 and Leo has already given us the quote of the year. The A&E problem, he said, won't get "a quick-fix" solution.

No kidding, Leo, you've figured that out, have you?

After weeks of flooding, the country is in rag order. The floods have left families distraught, emotionally exhausted and still facing weeks of misery.

Rather than wait for hours, people avoid A&E and go to their GPs instead, as the politicians tell them they ought to. And they put themselves in danger, because sometimes it's urgent emergency treatment they need, not general practice.

So, you wait nine hours, or twice that, amid the chaos and the fear. Then, when the overwhelmed medics finally get to you, you'll find - as so many of us can attest - the treatment is first class.

But the reason you or your parent or your child lingers for hours or days on a trolley is because the public health system has been torn asunder repeatedly at the behest of right-wing chancers.

And that was done to facilitate the greed of tax evaders in the 80s, and to pay the bills of bankers and bondholders from 2008 on.

Against this background of floods and public health dysfunction, the political parties are positioning themselves for the coming election.

The Taoiseach exudes confidence. His handlers go to London and huddle with Tory strategists, to see if they can get Enda an overall majority, as they did for David Cameron.

Fianna Fail shamelessly decries Fine Gael's right-wing extremism and declares itself "a bit to the Left".

Labour rushes to the defence of Fine Gael, with Joan Burton insisting her partners are not at all right wing. Sure, wouldn't James Connolly be proud of them?

Vote for us, we're better than them.

No, they're not.

Yes, we are.

Amid all this, there's Renua, the novice right-wing spin-off from Fine Gael. They're almost sweet, in their mix of eagerness, enthusiasm and opportunism.

Renua rushed to be first into the electoral field with a manifesto - but they had a problem. Fine Gael, Fianna Fail and Labour had taken all the right-wing policies, and all Lucinda and her friends could do was pick up the leftover right-wing gimmicks that are too silly for anyone else.

So, they try to convince themselves that nonsense like a flat tax and a three-strike crime policy aren't as loopy as they seem.

Meanwhile, the wheels of democracy turn.

There's Simon Harris on the radio. Fine Gael's Minister for Looking at the Floods while Wearing a Concerned Frown doesn't just do floods. He's talking about the A&E crisis and saying the Government won't "throw money at the problem".

Then, he goes off to frown at the floods again, and promises the sodden locals he'll throw money at the problem.

What matters most to these people is winning the seat again, getting the party into office, getting bums into Mercs.

To solve that problem, they don't hesitate to throw money at it. Between them, they'll spend millions.

Down in Tipperary, the billboards show a smiling Alan Kelly, Minister for Making a Balls of Irish Water. His slogan, believe it or not, is a defiant statement of everything that made our political system the plaything of chancers and careerists. Vote for Alan, it says, and "Keep Tipp at the Top Table".

Put Alan at the top table and he'll come home with some crumbs for the constituency, so he will. Bugger the other constituencies.

And in every other constituency, the local chancers and careerists are telling us to be damned with anyone else's welfare, as long as ye vote for me, I'll see the constituency right, so I will.

Fixing real problems - floods, A&E, homelessness, emigration, unemployment, schools with shanty classrooms where the roof blows off in a high wind - all that's too difficult and costly for the chancers and the careerists.

Besides, they've found out, down through the years, that they can rely on exploiting our local loyalties - or they can promise a wee tax cut.

And the bottom line defence is to manipulate our fear of change.

Some day - if not this election, the next one, or the one after that - we'll break this cycle.

We'll tell them to stop using our own money to tease our hopes of that wee tax cut, which will instantly be eaten up by price rises. We'll decide that the political panto they're preparing to put on isn't just childish, it diminishes our country.

Vote for us, we're better than them.

No, they're not.

Yes, we are.

We'll confront our fear of change. We'll reject the "devil you know" premise that broken hospitals, flooded living rooms, emigration for some and unlimited wealth for others is the natural way of things.

If not this time, perhaps the next.

Why wait?

Article by Gene Kerrigan Independent.ie


Lost Opportunity - Right2Change fragmentation and why some should step down

Article by James Quigley

James Quigley Boycott Irish Water

James Quigley Boycott Irish Water

At the outset let me say I don't know for sure what to call the Right2Change organisation.   Sometimes it goes by the name of Right2Water, other times it is Right2Water Ireland and at other times it is Right2Change.  I believe that in 2015 the name was changed to Right2Change.  I along with everyone in the Anti Water Charge' campaign are part of Right2Water movement.  This is includes Can't Pay Won't Pay, the Anti Austerity Alliance, all independent groups throughout the country and political parties who genuinely support the aims.  I will do all that I can to bring about the end of Water Charges, the abolition of the relevant Acts and abolition of the Irish Water Ltd company. I did not agree and still do not agree with the direction Right2Change has taken and I believe this was done in a very questionable manner.

Lost opportunity to build a strong unifying Anti Water Charge campaign

Now Brendan Ogle has called for nationwide demonstrations for Jan 23rd, 2016 and Sinead Stewart is calling a meeting of Right2Change Donegal to organise one in Letterkennny.  

This is a unilateral decision by self appointed leaders in Right2Change. It is a lost opportunity to build a strong unified anti water charge force which could include all opposition in the country.  It could have been used to reinvigorate the campaign throughout the country but instead it is being used to further individuals' profiles and and party agendas.  Who made this decision and why have organisations been left out?  To me this decision is not in the interest of the movement but instead it is once again fragmenting and partisan.

It is an exclusionist policy that they are practising and it reflects badly on the overall movement . In fact it points to ' a grab for personal profile' by certain individuals. This is amply portrayed in the first instance by the conferring of self-appointed titles of authority.  In normal democratic circumstances these titles are bestowed by the votes of the ordinary membership. This self-conferring is a fraud and says much about the real agendas of the individuals involved and indeed the acquiescence of those at the head of things.

Donegal sham officer board

I see that in the latest local newspapers that Charlie McDyer is chairperson, Owen Curran is spokesperson and Philip McFadden is secretary of Donegal branch.  They are calling a meeting on Jan 13th to organise a Rigt2Change demonstration in Letterkenny on Jan 23rd. Who conferred these titles on them and why are they persisting in this sham?  If there is an officer board why is Sinead Stewart so prolific on facebook speaking on behalf of Right2Change?

Call for resignations
I call this officer board to step down them to be stop speaking for the movement and stop conferring on themselves the sham titles.  The mere fact that Philip McFadden is there puts a lot of people off.

I call on Brendan Ogle and Sinead Stewart to resign and stop speaking for the movement.  I have written extensively about some of the terrible things they both have done.  I believe they both have done the movement a disservice.  They have caused factions and rifts.  Surely this is not good for the movement.   I can not have anything to do with them and I am ashamed that people in the movement have let them carry on as if nothing has happened despite ample evidence.

Way Forward both nationally and locally

I call on the national movement to re-admit the Anti Austerity Alliance and acknowledge the wrongdoings against them.  I call on Donegal Anti Water Charge movement to form a unifying group which would be representative of all strands of opposition in the county.  This would include Can't Pay Won't Pay and all non-aligned groups.  I call on all political parties to step back, support our campaign and not try to influence it or lead it for political gain.  It is a movement of the people and should not be hijacked and should include everyone who is genuinely opposed to Water Charges and Irish Water.  

The campaign should call for a strong boycott of water charges and Irish Water.  We should not rely on elections or political parties.  Any political party can have their own policy but we should encourage them to support us in a boycott.



Crooks, citizens or celebrities?

Ethics, or lack thereof, has been the raging catchphrase in Donegal recently with county councilor John O’Donnellcaught on RTE camera allegedly offering lobbying services for cash and Bunbeg-based, EU-funded former school principal, Finbarr Boyle, stealing more than 200,000 euro from a village school, including money earmarked for childrens’ food.

But what’s all the commotion about? Hasn’t there been such unsavory goings-on right here in Donegal for years? Why the shock? Or is there any, really?

In last weekend’s edition of ‘The Irish Times,’ columnist Fintan O’Toole, painted a scary scenario, a malaise spreading nationwide.

…other cultures criminalise the things they find unacceptable; we find unacceptable only the things that have been criminalized. If you can get away with it, we reckon, it can’t be all that bad.” He then quoted Central Bank Governor, Patrick Honohan on white-collar crime, saying, “It is remarkable, first of all, how long it takes, how heavy the procedures are and how light the consequences.

Back in Donegal

Ardara-born Finbarr Boyle’s story is well-publicized “School principal pleads guilty to 7 counts of theft and forgery.”

As a journalist and editor for over thirty years, I thought sharpened instincts had made me a good judge of character – boy, was I ever wrong.

Sitting at a lunch prepared by my wife in my home with Mr. Boyle as guest some time ago, I would never have guessed the man across from me would stoop to such lows as using a village school’s money where he was principal to treat himself royally to holidays in England, Spain and other fine places, car and house payments and expensive golf equipment.

(l to r): Concubhar Ó LIatháin, CeangalG Marketing Manager, Claire Nic Neacail, Alasdair Morrison CeangalG Director, Dinny McGinley Fine Gael TD and Fionbar Ó Baoill – CeangalG Training Manager.

(l to r): Concubhar Ó LIatháin, CeangalG Marketing Manager, Claire Nic Neacail, Alasdair Morrison CeangalG Director, Dinny McGinley Fine Gael TD and Fionbar Ó Baoill – CeangalG Training Manager.

Mr. Boyle was given space inside the headquarters of Údarás na Gaeltachta in the Gweedore Industrial Estate, Bunbeg as a training manager – surprising, as that particular organisation has refused to gave any free space to small, local entrepreneurs in that same estate, a situation local Sinn Fein TD Pearse Doherty, has consistently taken issue with.

I must admit, Mr. Boyle impressed me then, a fast talker, assertive and supremely confident. Yes, I know what you’re probably thinking – ‘Sounds like a conman to me.’ As things turned out, you are absolutely right. But I was left sad and disillusioned after learning of his multiple theft. He struck me then as the kind of person who could be a positive force for change, especially as we discussed the importance of ethics and the need for the Donegal Gaeltacht to rid itself of its historic cronyism and nepotism which have warped normal economic development of the region.

Yet this is the same person found guilty of seven counts of theft over a number of years (he admitted to many more as part of his plea bargain), for whom Judge John Aymler may not impose a custodial sentence because, in part, 25,000 euro of the money taken may be paid back within a year. That’s around a tenth of what was stolen.

Who says crime doesn’t pay?

A key question, however, still remains unanswered: Mr. Boyle was caught red-handed several years ago (the investigation has been ongoing for at least seven (7) years), so how did he obtain a well-paying position as training manager of a lucrative, multi-million euro, tax-payer supported EU funded project – ironically, one aimed at helping economically disadvantaged people? Was this , in itself, a classic case of nepotism and cronyism? Regardless of the multiple thefts, people have asked, “Does a school principal have the business credentials to train entrepreneurs?”

When contacted by me this week on the issue, Dr D. Munro, chair of the CeangalG Steering Group, Sabhal Mor Ostaig in Scotland, e-mailed back, saying, “Mr. Boyle’s actual contract of employment, for the post of Training Officer, with the wider CeangalG Project, was formally and directly managed through our Project Partners, Údarás na Gaeltachta.” He added that Mr. Boyle was “employed by the project between 9th Sept 2013 and 31st March 2015.” The Gardai investigation began as late as 2008 and Mr. Boyle, according to media reports, admitted his thefts almost two years ago (January last year).

Mr. Munro added, “At no stage in either the recruitment process or during his subsequent period of employment, was CeangalG ever made aware of there being any on-going police investigation.” Mr. Munro cc his email to the law company of Wright, Johnston & Mackenzie and to the University of the Highlands. Have I touched a red button?

Entitled CeangalG (ConenctG), this project is funded by the EU’s INTERREG IVA, Bòrd na Gàidhlig, MG ALBA, the Scottish Government, Sabhal Mòr Ostaig and Cultúrlann McAdam Ó Fiaich and focuses on the Gaeltachts of Donegal, Scotland and Belfast. On it’s website, it states:

As for independent councilor John O’Donnell, the ball is largely in his court. He can do the dignified thing and bow out. If he stays, he places the entire council under a shadow. Independent councillor Frank McBrearty says he should be removed from all committees. But it seems resigning is the last thing O’Donnell will do. Another Independent councillor, Micheál Cholm Mac Giolla Easbuic, is right in asking fellow councilors to walk out of the chamber at the next meeting in protest. Someone has to stand up, otherwise – due to blatant impunity – it will get much worse. Let’s see if that happens. If not, then Fintan O’Toole’s words ring frighteningly true.

Independent councilor John O Donnell: will he do the right thing?

Independent councilor John O Donnell: will he do the right thing?

But questionable dealings are nothing new in Donegal, as many local people have told me.

Under the auspices of the former Fianna Fáil government, Liam Cunningham (Liam Ó Cuinneagáin), was paid substantial sums for his services as member and long-time chairperson of Údarás na Gaeltachta – more than a quarter of a million euro. Between 2002 to 2012, his travel expenses alone amounted to 131,730 euro. His fees amounted to 206,962 euro.

More than that, documents requested by me under the Freedom of Information Act also now show that at least one company he established, Oideas Gael, received generous amounts of money – more than 350,000 euro in a series of payments – from the very same organization he chaired for so long. Mr. Cunningham said Oideas Gael was a hobby. With a financial return like that, that’s quite a hobby.

In stock market terms, is this not a case of insider trading, and therefore unethical? After all, no better-placed person to access money from a group than the person who’s on the inside track of that very same group, knowing intimately its budgets, its strategy and its key staff. When called by me about this situation in a phone interview, Liam said, “Sean, things were different then. I don’t see it as a conflict of interest.” Different then? How is it different? The question was never answered.

Liam Cunningham: is it wrong to lobby for money from the very funding organisation that you chair?

Liam Cunningham: is it wrong to lobby for money from the very funding organisation that you chair?

Some readers might say, ‘Liam hosts Irish-language classes.’ That’s true, but so do many others and they don’t benefit from the rich financial backing Oideas Gael received so handily. Still others could do so – if they had that kind of money. Is such treatment fair and ethical? Is the playing ground a level one? How many times has Údarás said there’s not enough money for your project?

The particular situation of Mr. Cunningham also raises an inevitable question: was it linked to an ongoing quid pro quo agreement among local Údarás board members then? And has anything changed since? Interested to find out? You have the right to know, and here’s how. (See below).

Mr. Cunningham has since been named, ‘Donegal Person of the Year.’ Considering the dire economic development of the Gaeltacht, where I live, under his watch, the question must be asked, ‘Is this how we want the term ‘model citizen’ to be defined?”

Michael Heaney, formerly a director of services with Donegal County Council, has recently been appointed director of Enterprise & Investment with Údarás. Will his leadership change the way Údarás doles out money, how it selects projects to fund? Or will the same old cadre of elites be the recipients? Time will tell.

As Údarás is helping DLDC select projects for funding under the EU’s upcoming LEADER programme, it will be operating under much tighter European regulations than the rather loose Irish ones it has been working under thus far. It will be interesting to monitor the quality of their project selection process for LEADER.

As O’Toole writes in last Saturday’s column, “If corruption is very low on the list of priorities for criminal justice, it is little higher on the list of political priorities…. So long as impunity reigns, the rare eejit who gets caught will always evoke sympathy… What marks out (Ireland) is the breathtaking degree of impunity for all white-collar crimes.

Isn’t it long past time this situation changed? The upcoming election gives us the chance to affect such change. Inofthis regard, it is worth noting the words‘Donegal News’ columnist Martin McGinley’s in Friday’s edition, “We get what we accept.”

You have the right to know:

You can find out additional information on the dealings of Údarás by e-mailing Judy Ní Dhubháin at judy(at)udaras.ie. Quoting the FOI Act 2014, you can ask for any information you like, financial or otherwise. The service is free.

Anyone wanting answers from CeangalG, can contact Dr D. Munro, chair of the CeangalG Steering Group at dm.smo(at)uhi.ac.uk or +44 (0) 1471 888352. Claire Nicolson is the organisation’s administrator claire(at)ceangalg.net Alasdair Morrison, a former minister in the Government of Scotland, is its director. Or through Údarás na Gaeltachta, Donegal. Tel: 074-9560100. Fax: 074-9560101. Email: dnag(at)udaras.ie

Original article in http://seanhillenblog.com/2015/12/20/crooks-citizens-or-celebrities/