Electricity bills to jump as report slams bonuses

eirgrid.jpg

Consumers and businesses are facing hikes in electricity charges at a time when the operators of the network are getting bonuses of up to 15 per cent.

The two companies responsible for the country’s electricity network are in line for spending increases of €1.8 billion over the next five years, bringing their total budgets to €5.2 billion.

This will increase the average electricity bill for a family by at least 5 per cent over the next five years. Businesses can expect similar increases in their electricity costs.

A significant proportion of the increases in network charges will go to fund new power lines being planned by the state-owned grid operator Eirgrid. Some €500 million, meanwhile, will be used to fund the rollout of smart electricity meters to two million households by ESB Networks, which maintains the network.

However, a report prepared for the Commission for Energy Regulation by consultants has criticised the bonus payments made to staff at Eirgrid. The consultants, Jacobs, found that Eirgrid had consistently paid bonuses of up to 15 per cent to its staff during the economic recession over the past five years.

The report said that it would have expected the payments to vary with “some achieving their targets and others failing”. But Eirgrid did not give any precise details of what the staff had done to earn this “performance-related pay”, and the report found that only 14 per cent of the biggest electricity projects were delivered on time over the past five years.

The Jacobs report states that between €6 million and €7 million of the money Eirgrid has paid out in bonuses was “inefficient”, and that their cost should not be passed on to electricity customers.

It showed that the highest individual bonus payments were to Eirgrid managers, who got 15.4 per cent in 2012. These managers are getting slightly lower performance-related payments of 14.1 per cent this year. There are also performance related payments for Eirgrid professionals (13.2 per cent), directors (10.2 per cent), and those in graduate or support grades(12.6 per cent). The average bonus payment this year is 13.1 per cent.

Eirgrid has applied to the regulator to continue paying bonus payments of up to 15 per cent to staff for the next five years. It said it did not make the payments to all staff, and that it was keeping all aspects of its business under review, including staff wages, “to ensure they are competitive and in line with market rates”.

The energy regulator is proposing annual increases in the two main electricity charges which fund Eirgrid and ESB Networks. Electricity distribution charges are paid to ESB Networks and account for 25 per cent of customers’ bills.

The proposed rises of 1.9 per cent per year up to 2020 are on top of inflation. Economist Stephen Kinsella has calculated that this equates to an 18 per cent increase in distribution charges over the next five years. He said this alone will increase the average electricity bill by almost 5 per cent over the period.

“Oil prices are collapsing and commodity prices are in the toilet. But the operators are hoovering up a bigger increase in the recovery for themselves,” he said.

The Commission for Energy Regulation has also proposed that the electricity transmission charges, which are paid to Eirgrid, will rise by 2.5 per cent per year up to 2020.

These charges have a smaller impact on households because they only account for 5 per cent of customers bills. The regulator has not released any figures on what the overall rise in electricity charges would cost consumers over the next five years.

A spokesman said the proposed impact this year would be a 1 per cent rise in electricity bills – which would add around €10 to an annual household bill.

“The actual outcome for customer prices depends, among other factors, on international fuel and related generation costs, which are currently circa 50 per cent of the overall cost of electricity to customers,” he said.

Eirgrid’s staffing costs went €16 million over budget over the past five years, with its 278 staff now paid an average salary of €97,000 each. It argued that it was using a “holistic approach” by increasing staff numbers and reducing the hiring of outside contractors.

It has to work with ESB Networks, which has 3,145 staff, to maintain the electricity network. They get an average salary of €80,000 and bonuses of up to 8 per cent. But the Jacobs report said there were signs that targets were “sufficiently robust”.

ESB Networks failed to deliver €10 million of efficiency savings that it had promised and is consistently missing its targets for maintaining the electricity network. The consultants said this consistent underperformance may lead to “an ongoing degradation of the health of the assets”.

ESB Networks said it was inappropriate to comment because the public consultation on the electricity charges was still ongoing. “We will participate in that consultation and look forward to conclusion of the process,” a spokesman said.


Smart Meters What Are They And Why We Should Be Worried About Them!

Read all about 'Smart Meters' at www.fliuch.org/smart-meters.


Smart meters: criminalising landlords, ripping off consumers

This article is written by Mel Kelly in www.opendemocracy.net August 11, 2015.  It concerns the implementation of a controversial European energy directive in the UK.  (Buncrana Together)

By Mel Kelly

Why is the government rolling out smart meters that have been repeatedly exposed as expensive, poorly tested and potential threats to our privacy?

An EU energy directive proclaimed 80% of homes across the EU should have smart meters fitted by 2020 if fitting them is cost effective in the long run. 

In 2013, the German Economy Ministry described the EU’s recommendation as “inadvisable” because the installation of smart meters “would be too costly for customers… citing an Ernst & Young report which concluded the cost of fitting them outweighs the installation costs”. Nine other EU countries agreed with Germany.

The Coalition government, on the other hand, decided Britain’s taxpayers, already struggling to meet deficit reduction, should be forced to pay £11 billion to roll out “smart” meters to replace the energy meters on behalf of the poor energy industry.

One article which slammed the decision as a colossal waste of cash revealed an independent report written by Mott McDonald for the government stated smart meters would not be cost effective as they would bring a £4 billion net present value cost – the civil service, in contrast, inflated this figure by £8 billion, claiming there would be a £4 billion net present value benefit instead.

But by March this year the Energy and Climate Change Committee themselves agreed with the Mott McDonald conclusion, stating the planned roll-out “runs the risk of falling far short of expectations. At worst, it could prove to be a costly failure”, costing most consumers more than it could save them.

This was backed by a report by the institute of directors in the same month, which warned that the government’s rollout of smart meters “‘should be halted, altered or scrapped’ to avoid a potentially catastrophic government IT disaster” with their report describing the £11bn scheme as “unwanted by consumers, over-engineered and mind-blowingly expensive”.

“No legal obligation”

Despite the weight of evidence now coming against the government rolling out smart meters and the government commitment “there will not be a legal obligation on individuals to have one” the government has decided to not only force smart meters on the nation but to start criminalising those who don’t fit them.

In March this year the coalition government amended “The Heat Network (Metering and Billing Regulations) 2014 ” to make it a criminal offence if public and private landlords do not fit smart meters in their properties if they have more than one tenant and the heat is supplied from “communal or district” heat networks.

The legislation covers both the landlord and all their tenants (and sub-tenants) placing a legal obligation on all to supply “accurate billing information” with landlords having to report to the “National Measurement and Regulations Office” (weights and measures).

This means people renting  in high rise tower blocks, sheltered Housing complexes, eco communities where the power comes from communal and community heating systems must have smart meters fitted by their landlords – by law – despite the government’s claim there would be “no legal obligation” to have one fitted.

Homeowners and sole tenancies are exempt, for now, with the government choosing to target pensioners and the poor in high rise tower blocks first, like benefit changes, targeting the weakest in society first who are paying higher bills than the rest of the nation.

The government has also chosen to target the least powerful in the business community too for smart meters to be fitted first, with most small businesses still unaware “half hourly charging” by energy companies, which just happen to require smart meters, will come into effect, only for “small business premises”, from April 2017.

“Massive collection of personal data”

As well as huge economic cost to landlords, tenants, smallbusiness and the tax payer, the government’s roll out of smart meters reports warn of this also bringing major privacy and health concerns along with massively inflated energy bills due to errors that appear to be inherent in smart meter systems.

The EU Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) warned in 2012 smart meters could be a threat to privacy as they are capable of “massive collection of personal data” over and above energy consumption as smart meters could “track what households do within the privacy of their homes” with the Guardian going on to say “Anna Fielder, consumer rights advocate and campaigner at Privacy International revealed research in Germany showed Germans feel it’s really creepy and they don’t want Big Brother in their house.”

Health and cost

Dr David Carpenter MD, a Harvard Medical School graduate, who has worked in the area of electromagnetic fields (EMFs) and public health for over 18 years warns that

“While no one has actually done human health studies in relation to people living in homes with smart meters we have evidence from a whole variety of other sources of radio frequency exposure that demonstrates convincingly and consistently that exposure to radio-frequency radiation (RFR) at elevated levels for long periods of time increases the risk of cancer, damages the nervous system and adversely affects the reproductive organs”.

Worldwide, consumers are also complaining of their electricity bills increasing hugely after smart meters are fitted, with one man in Florida complaining his bed-ridden mother’s electricity bill claimed her consumption had increased nearly 59% since the smart meter was installed, despite his mother’s habits not changing.

Reports in Canada reveal energy bill shocks for Canadians too after smart meters were rolled out, with one man’s energy bill increasing 5 fold after the smart meter was fitted with the report going on to say “Since smart meters were installed, the Ontario Ombudsman was investigating nearly 11,000 complaints about the energy company Hydro One’s bills.”

Just weeks ago the Ontario Ombudsman produced a damning report where he said “Hydro One issued faulty bills to more than 100,000 customers, lied to the government and regulators in a bid to cover up the problem” with a senior citizen in Timmins who had $10,000 pulled from his bank account” and “A ski resort unexpectedly received a bill for $37 million.” Good reason for cancelling your direct debit if a smart meter is installed. 

Just last week the UK energy industry criticised the government proposals for testing smart meters, for not meeting industry standards, which does not bode well for Britain.

It is no wonder we have a deficit when the government acts against the advice of its own energy committee, the CBI and ten other EU countries who all state this is against the national interest as it adds huge unnecessary costs (£11 billion and counting) in these times of deficit and austerity while setting UK business at a disadvantage within the EU.

Add to this the likelihood of business and households up and down the country starting to receive hugely inflated energy bills with huge sums being unexpectedly taken from their bank accounts by direct debit because the government is rolling out smart meters that have not been tested to industry standards.

How will the shoddy testing impact on our health and our privacy as well as our wallets?

Who will be liable – landlords, energy companies or taxpayers when it all goes wrong?

Should it be a crime for tenants and landlords to provide wrongful billing data when the smart meters approved by the government are not tested to industry standards?

Should the government’s smart meter programme be cancelled now? The answer must be yes.

Original article in https://www.opendemocracy.net/ourkingdom/mel-kelly/smart-meters-criminalising-landlords-ripping-off-consumers


The Nobel Peace Prize winner, the sewage plant and Irish Water

Glenburnie Beach, Moville, Inishowen, Co Donegal

Glenburnie Beach, Moville, Inishowen, Co Donegal

The European Commission could scupper Irish Water’s plan to build a controversial €13 million sewage plant next to Nobel laureate John Hume’s Donegal home

Hume’s wife Pat told this newspaper that the house at beautiful Glenburnie Beach in Carnagarve had been “a lifesaver” for her husband during dark times and the threat of the sewage plant had been “devastating”.

But a European Commission official investigating the matter has raised concerns about the way Irish authorities approved the project, according to correspondence seen by this newspaper. It is another potential complication in Irish Water’s task to end serious raw sewage problems afflicting 44 Irish urban areas.

The embattled state water company has planning permission from An Bord Pleanála for a sewage plant at the site on Lough Foyle to cater for a population of 8,800 in nearby Moville and Greencastle. But locals have fought for a decade to have the plant moved out of Lough Foyle to a site on the nearby Atlantic coastline.

John Hume and his wife Pat pictured in Derry earlier this year Picture: James Whorriskey

John Hume and his wife Pat pictured in Derry earlier this year Picture: James Whorriskey

“There is a horrendous problem with raw sewage going straight into the rivers,” said Enda Craig, who has led the fight. “People in Moville and Greencastle have to live with the smell and the rats so it is understandable some want it put anywhere at this stage. But Carnagarve Beach is beautiful and the wrong place for this.”

John Hume’s wife Pat agreed, describing Irish Water’s proposed solution as “shortsighted”.

“John and I are both getting well on in years but we think of our children and grandchildren,” she said, explaining they bought the house “after a very bad period” in 1987 when their house in Derry and two cars were firebombed.

“Very few people went to this part of Inishowen because you had to come through British army checkpoints so properties were very reasonable. It’s the best thing we ever did. It has really been a lifesaver. ”

“This is one of the most beautiful coastal pathways in Ireland,” she said. “To jeopardise it in any way is wrong and shortsighted. This magnificent shore walk is one of the big things it has to offer and it would be a terrible shame if it was jeopardised when other alternatives exist.”

Following the loss of a judicial review in 2013, local objectors took their case to Europe. They claimed a failure by the Irish government to transpose the EU’s Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) directive into law had allowed the Donegal sewage plant to be granted planning permission ahead of the granting of an EPA discharge licence and proper assessment of the impact of a 300 metre long sewage outfall into Lough Foyle.

Irish Water said it is advancing the project to comply with wastewater regulations and a EPA discharge licence. It expects to tender the project in the next 12-18 months.

A Department of the Environment planning official dismissed the concerns in an email to Craig saying that “the Department understands that the EC [European Commission] is satisfied that the EIA Directive has been transposed satisfactorily in this regard.”

But a senior Commission official tasked with monitoring Ireland’s compliance with EU environmental law wrote last week in an email seen by this newspaper that “we are of the view that the EIA Directive applies in a case such as Moville in that an EIA screening process was required. We will be discussing this issue with the Irish authorities over the coming weeks.”

Saga

The email is just the latest twist in a saga that has run since plans were first put in place to build the plant in 1989. Following local consultation, a site outside the Foyle Estuary was eventually chosen in 2003.

But this was suddenly dropped two years later in favour of Carnagrave Beach, a site subsequently rejected three times by an An Bord Pleanála planning inspector. It is believed locally that the British crown still lays claim to the seabed right across the lough from Derry to the Co Donegal shoreline, which, objectors predict, could cause issues if construction proceeds.

In 2006 the Port and Harbour Authority in the area objected to the plant’s proposed 650-metre effluent outfall pipe running beneath the nearby busy navigation channel. But instead of abandoning the proposed site, the county council cut the outfall length to 300 metres. Objectors claim this greatly increases the risk of effluent being washed back onto the shore.

A hydrographic report prepared for Donegal County Council attempted to dispel this fear saying treated sewage would be pushed out of the mouth of the estuary by strong currents. But a senior oceanographer engaged by locals produced a report to say that the sewage, including raw sewage at certain times, would indeed be pushed onto the shoreline twice a day by the tide.

Meanwhile, locals applied to Donegal County Council to have Carnagrave Beach officially designated as a bathing location under EPA rules, possibly forcing the relocation of the plant.

But the local authority, which directed all queries from this newspaper on the project to Irish Water, refused to grant the bathing designation saying it preferred to allocate scarce resources to existing Blue Flag beaches in the county.

By Fearghal O’Connor Sunday Business Post Aug 9, 2015


The Campaign for a Clean Estuary in Inishowen says indications coming from Europe are that their challenge against a Sewage Treatment Plant at Carnagarve near Moville will be adjudicated on later this year.
It follows a Sunday Business Post report that EU officials have expressed concern at elements of the plan, and the way the location was determined.
Campaign spokesperson Enda Craig says this is potentially very significant………


Save the Foyle THE SOLUTION

Click Image to go to Save the Foyle web page

Click Image to go to Save the Foyle web page

The sewage plant and pipe should go north of Greencastle (as was decided by council motion of 1990) where the effluent can be treated and discharged into the open sea. THE RIGHT PLANT IN THE RIGHT PLACE