Lame Duck Donegal County Council, Corruption and Councillor's Inaction over O'Donnell Controversy

Reaction and inaction of Donegal Councillors over appearance of the infamous Cllr John O'Donnell at the council meeting in Lifford, Co Donegal, Monday, January 25thSee Winds of Corruption Hit Donegal

In good company left to right - Top Padraig Flynn,  Ray Burke, Bertie Ahern, Liam Lawlor, Brien Cowan, Charles Haughey, Bottom - Hugh McElbaney, John O'Donnell, Joe Queenan

In good company left to right - Top Padraig Flynn,  Ray Burke, Bertie Ahern, Liam Lawlor, Brien Cowan, Charles Haughey, Bottom - Hugh McElbaney, John O'Donnell, Joe Queenan

The following is an extract from DonegalDaily, Monday Jan 27, 2016.  Click on opposite photograph of Cllr O Donnell taking his seat at council.

Cllr John O'Donnell, takes his seat in council council.   DonegalDaily,

Cllr John O'Donnell, takes his seat in council council.   DonegalDaily,

UPROAR AT COUNCIL AS McBREARTY LOSES BID TO EXPEL CLLR JOHN O’DONNELL

CLLR Frank McBrearty has lost in his bid to have Cllr John O'Donnell kicked off council committees.
Councillors voted for a counter motion from Cllr Ian McGarvey and seconded by Cllr Nicholas Crossan allowing for 'due process' in the controversy

Councillors voted 20 votes to 12 in favour of moving on from the issue and to allow the current investigation into O'Donnell to continue.
Councillors John Campbell and Michael Mac Giolla Easbuig walked out of the meeting.
The meeting had to be suspended as members of the public walked out and staged a noisy protest just outside the council chamber.
Earlier councillors were told that they cannot expel controversial councillor O'Donnell.
The council had already ruled they cannot remove him as a council.
Cllr O'Donnell arrived at the January monthly meeting in Lifford today before it started.
He took his seat without talking to councillors. He has been at the centre of a media storm since an RTE programme broadcast on December 7 showed him offering favours to an undercover journalist team in return for payment.
Cllr Frank McBrearty told the chamber that he knew that the council could not remove O'Donnell from his seat as a councillor.
However he said the council did have the power to remove the Kilmacrennan man from council committees.
"We need to send a clear signal to this country that we will not tolerate corruption in Ireland and more specifically here in Donegal," said Cllr McBrearty.

The motion was seconded by Cllr John Campbell.

However council director Liam Ward said based on legal advice given to the council, councillors did not have power to expel Cllr O'Donnell from committees.
Today I have been attacked by councillors from Fianna Fail and Sinn Fein for walking out of the council chamber yesterday.
I am very disappointed that only myself and Independent Cllr John Campbell were prepared to walk out on a point of principle.
In December all councillors attended a special meeting and called on O'Donnell to resign but a month later they are not prepared to back that up by voting with their feet.
They had a chance to remove O'Donnell from his committee positions but refused even to do that. The next item on the agenda was the disposal of council assets.
This is precisely the kind of decision which is compromised by the continuing presence of O'Donnell in the chamber and shows why every means to pressurise him should be used to force him to stand down.

But instead of maintaining the pressure on O'Donnell, the political parties have chosen to close ranks and attack me and John Campbell instead. I can only assume our walkout has angered them by exposing their unwillingness to take any action.
 


The following is an extract from DonegalNow, Wednesday, Jan 27, 2016.  Click on opposite photograph to read full article.

Donegal County Council, Lifford

Donegal County Council, Lifford

MAC GIOLLA EASBUIG ACCUSEd COUNCILLORS OF ATTACKING HIM OVER O'DONNELL WALKOUT

A Donegal councillor has lashed out at councillors he accuses of attacking him for walking out of the Donegal County Council meeting yesterday.

Cllr MacGiolla Easbuig

Cllr MacGiolla Easbuig

Michéal Cholm Mac Giolla Easbuig said he has been attacked by councillors from Fianna Fáil and Sinn Féin following a walkout staged by himself and John Campbell yesterday in protest at the presence of Councillor John O'Donnell.

"I am very disappointed that only myself and Independent Cllr John Campbell were prepared to walk out on a point of principle," said Mac Giolla Easbuig.

Cllr John Campbell

Cllr John Campbell

In December, all councillors attended a special meeting in which they called on John O'Donnell to resign, but Mac Giolla Easbuig said he is disappointed they were not willing to vote with their feet yesterday.

"Instead of maintaining the pressure on O'Donnell, the political parties have chosen to close ranks and attack me and John Campbell instead. I can only assume our walkout has angered them by exposing their unwillingness to take any action," he said.

"What goes on in Lifford at meetings every second month only consumes a fraction of my time working as a councillor. The people know how hard I work on their behalf," Mac Giolla Easbuig said.


Cllr Dessie Shiels

Cllr Dessie Shiels

Councillor Dessie Shiels, from Letterkenny, did not attend the council meeting because he objected to Cllr John O'Donnell's presence.

 

 



Crooks, citizens or celebrities?

Ethics, or lack thereof, has been the raging catchphrase in Donegal recently with county councilor John O’Donnellcaught on RTE camera allegedly offering lobbying services for cash and Bunbeg-based, EU-funded former school principal, Finbarr Boyle, stealing more than 200,000 euro from a village school, including money earmarked for childrens’ food.

But what’s all the commotion about? Hasn’t there been such unsavory goings-on right here in Donegal for years? Why the shock? Or is there any, really?

In last weekend’s edition of ‘The Irish Times,’ columnist Fintan O’Toole, painted a scary scenario, a malaise spreading nationwide.

…other cultures criminalise the things they find unacceptable; we find unacceptable only the things that have been criminalized. If you can get away with it, we reckon, it can’t be all that bad.” He then quoted Central Bank Governor, Patrick Honohan on white-collar crime, saying, “It is remarkable, first of all, how long it takes, how heavy the procedures are and how light the consequences.

Back in Donegal

Ardara-born Finbarr Boyle’s story is well-publicized “School principal pleads guilty to 7 counts of theft and forgery.”

As a journalist and editor for over thirty years, I thought sharpened instincts had made me a good judge of character – boy, was I ever wrong.

Sitting at a lunch prepared by my wife in my home with Mr. Boyle as guest some time ago, I would never have guessed the man across from me would stoop to such lows as using a village school’s money where he was principal to treat himself royally to holidays in England, Spain and other fine places, car and house payments and expensive golf equipment.

(l to r): Concubhar Ó LIatháin, CeangalG Marketing Manager, Claire Nic Neacail, Alasdair Morrison CeangalG Director, Dinny McGinley Fine Gael TD and Fionbar Ó Baoill – CeangalG Training Manager.

(l to r): Concubhar Ó LIatháin, CeangalG Marketing Manager, Claire Nic Neacail, Alasdair Morrison CeangalG Director, Dinny McGinley Fine Gael TD and Fionbar Ó Baoill – CeangalG Training Manager.

Mr. Boyle was given space inside the headquarters of Údarás na Gaeltachta in the Gweedore Industrial Estate, Bunbeg as a training manager – surprising, as that particular organisation has refused to gave any free space to small, local entrepreneurs in that same estate, a situation local Sinn Fein TD Pearse Doherty, has consistently taken issue with.

I must admit, Mr. Boyle impressed me then, a fast talker, assertive and supremely confident. Yes, I know what you’re probably thinking – ‘Sounds like a conman to me.’ As things turned out, you are absolutely right. But I was left sad and disillusioned after learning of his multiple theft. He struck me then as the kind of person who could be a positive force for change, especially as we discussed the importance of ethics and the need for the Donegal Gaeltacht to rid itself of its historic cronyism and nepotism which have warped normal economic development of the region.

Yet this is the same person found guilty of seven counts of theft over a number of years (he admitted to many more as part of his plea bargain), for whom Judge John Aymler may not impose a custodial sentence because, in part, 25,000 euro of the money taken may be paid back within a year. That’s around a tenth of what was stolen.

Who says crime doesn’t pay?

A key question, however, still remains unanswered: Mr. Boyle was caught red-handed several years ago (the investigation has been ongoing for at least seven (7) years), so how did he obtain a well-paying position as training manager of a lucrative, multi-million euro, tax-payer supported EU funded project – ironically, one aimed at helping economically disadvantaged people? Was this , in itself, a classic case of nepotism and cronyism? Regardless of the multiple thefts, people have asked, “Does a school principal have the business credentials to train entrepreneurs?”

When contacted by me this week on the issue, Dr D. Munro, chair of the CeangalG Steering Group, Sabhal Mor Ostaig in Scotland, e-mailed back, saying, “Mr. Boyle’s actual contract of employment, for the post of Training Officer, with the wider CeangalG Project, was formally and directly managed through our Project Partners, Údarás na Gaeltachta.” He added that Mr. Boyle was “employed by the project between 9th Sept 2013 and 31st March 2015.” The Gardai investigation began as late as 2008 and Mr. Boyle, according to media reports, admitted his thefts almost two years ago (January last year).

Mr. Munro added, “At no stage in either the recruitment process or during his subsequent period of employment, was CeangalG ever made aware of there being any on-going police investigation.” Mr. Munro cc his email to the law company of Wright, Johnston & Mackenzie and to the University of the Highlands. Have I touched a red button?

Entitled CeangalG (ConenctG), this project is funded by the EU’s INTERREG IVA, Bòrd na Gàidhlig, MG ALBA, the Scottish Government, Sabhal Mòr Ostaig and Cultúrlann McAdam Ó Fiaich and focuses on the Gaeltachts of Donegal, Scotland and Belfast. On it’s website, it states:

As for independent councilor John O’Donnell, the ball is largely in his court. He can do the dignified thing and bow out. If he stays, he places the entire council under a shadow. Independent councillor Frank McBrearty says he should be removed from all committees. But it seems resigning is the last thing O’Donnell will do. Another Independent councillor, Micheál Cholm Mac Giolla Easbuic, is right in asking fellow councilors to walk out of the chamber at the next meeting in protest. Someone has to stand up, otherwise – due to blatant impunity – it will get much worse. Let’s see if that happens. If not, then Fintan O’Toole’s words ring frighteningly true.

Independent councilor John O Donnell: will he do the right thing?

Independent councilor John O Donnell: will he do the right thing?

But questionable dealings are nothing new in Donegal, as many local people have told me.

Under the auspices of the former Fianna Fáil government, Liam Cunningham (Liam Ó Cuinneagáin), was paid substantial sums for his services as member and long-time chairperson of Údarás na Gaeltachta – more than a quarter of a million euro. Between 2002 to 2012, his travel expenses alone amounted to 131,730 euro. His fees amounted to 206,962 euro.

More than that, documents requested by me under the Freedom of Information Act also now show that at least one company he established, Oideas Gael, received generous amounts of money – more than 350,000 euro in a series of payments – from the very same organization he chaired for so long. Mr. Cunningham said Oideas Gael was a hobby. With a financial return like that, that’s quite a hobby.

In stock market terms, is this not a case of insider trading, and therefore unethical? After all, no better-placed person to access money from a group than the person who’s on the inside track of that very same group, knowing intimately its budgets, its strategy and its key staff. When called by me about this situation in a phone interview, Liam said, “Sean, things were different then. I don’t see it as a conflict of interest.” Different then? How is it different? The question was never answered.

Liam Cunningham: is it wrong to lobby for money from the very funding organisation that you chair?

Liam Cunningham: is it wrong to lobby for money from the very funding organisation that you chair?

Some readers might say, ‘Liam hosts Irish-language classes.’ That’s true, but so do many others and they don’t benefit from the rich financial backing Oideas Gael received so handily. Still others could do so – if they had that kind of money. Is such treatment fair and ethical? Is the playing ground a level one? How many times has Údarás said there’s not enough money for your project?

The particular situation of Mr. Cunningham also raises an inevitable question: was it linked to an ongoing quid pro quo agreement among local Údarás board members then? And has anything changed since? Interested to find out? You have the right to know, and here’s how. (See below).

Mr. Cunningham has since been named, ‘Donegal Person of the Year.’ Considering the dire economic development of the Gaeltacht, where I live, under his watch, the question must be asked, ‘Is this how we want the term ‘model citizen’ to be defined?”

Michael Heaney, formerly a director of services with Donegal County Council, has recently been appointed director of Enterprise & Investment with Údarás. Will his leadership change the way Údarás doles out money, how it selects projects to fund? Or will the same old cadre of elites be the recipients? Time will tell.

As Údarás is helping DLDC select projects for funding under the EU’s upcoming LEADER programme, it will be operating under much tighter European regulations than the rather loose Irish ones it has been working under thus far. It will be interesting to monitor the quality of their project selection process for LEADER.

As O’Toole writes in last Saturday’s column, “If corruption is very low on the list of priorities for criminal justice, it is little higher on the list of political priorities…. So long as impunity reigns, the rare eejit who gets caught will always evoke sympathy… What marks out (Ireland) is the breathtaking degree of impunity for all white-collar crimes.

Isn’t it long past time this situation changed? The upcoming election gives us the chance to affect such change. Inofthis regard, it is worth noting the words‘Donegal News’ columnist Martin McGinley’s in Friday’s edition, “We get what we accept.”

You have the right to know:

You can find out additional information on the dealings of Údarás by e-mailing Judy Ní Dhubháin at judy(at)udaras.ie. Quoting the FOI Act 2014, you can ask for any information you like, financial or otherwise. The service is free.

Anyone wanting answers from CeangalG, can contact Dr D. Munro, chair of the CeangalG Steering Group at dm.smo(at)uhi.ac.uk or +44 (0) 1471 888352. Claire Nicolson is the organisation’s administrator claire(at)ceangalg.net Alasdair Morrison, a former minister in the Government of Scotland, is its director. Or through Údarás na Gaeltachta, Donegal. Tel: 074-9560100. Fax: 074-9560101. Email: dnag(at)udaras.ie

Original article in http://seanhillenblog.com/2015/12/20/crooks-citizens-or-celebrities/


Dodgy Donegal. Environment Department ‘reviews’ evidence of former senior county planner, Gerard Convie.

by Michael Smith, Village. 9 December, 2015, 12:11 am

Featured image is of housing in Donegal: no impropriety and none imputed.

Featured image is of housing in Donegal: no impropriety and none imputed.

Michael McLoone is Chairman of B&B Ireland and of Donegal Airport, and of the Prison Service group under Haddington Road, and was, until recently, on the board of Enterprise Ireland and was formerly CEO of Beaumont Hospital in Dublin, and chairman of the Blood Transfusion Board. His brother, Peter, was a globe-trotting CEO of Fás. Another brother, Paul, was chairman of Donegal Tourism. But the focus in this article is on Michael McLoone in his controversion Manager of Donegal County Council (1994-2010).

A senior Planner in Donegal County Council, Gerry Convie, was subject to an investigation by his new boss within a week of McLoone taking up the position of Manager in 1994. Ultimately, following a further investigation instigated in 1998, Convie was suspended by Manager McLoone in 1999 for allegedly not following procedures in relation to his purchase of a parcel of land at Magheraroarty, near Bloody Foreland. Convie sued, asserting he had placed his interest on the public register, such as it was, and in all relevant planning applications and had not improperly influenced any planning application. The Department of the Environment, under Noel Dempsey, backed McLoone.

In the end, McLoone and Convie signed an out-of-Court agreement that he had merely made an “error of judgement”, and benefited from a financial settlement. He then resigned. In 2001, Jim Harley became Senior Planner. Later McLoone told councillors that Convie was involved in wrongdoing contrary to the signed Agreement and contrary to his later remarks before the High Court. After this, Convie entered private practice and, as a result of some of the matters he saw in that capacity, made a number of complaints to the Minister. As he reverted to private practice, he claims to have discovered many improprieties in the planning system in Donegal, “a cesspit”.

Ultimately he complained regarding 20 Case Studies to various Ministers for the Environment and to the Standards in Public Office Commission (which ruled most of the complaints not within its remit) to no avail. In 2006 the Council sued Convie for alleged breach of the Agreement, but dropped the proceedings after a fractious four years, without any damages or costs award, but with huge cost to the County.
The current County Manager, Séamus Neely, has enthusiastically expressed his support for the actions and statements of Mr McLoone in all these matters and goes so far as to state that there is nothing wrong with the type of relationships which Jim Harley cultivated and has expressed support for the treatment of Convie by Mr McLoone.

Convie worked in Donegal County Council as a planner for 24 years. He claims it was well known in Donegal, and beyond, that he would not capitulate to the “goings-on in planning” by certain councilors and senior officials in Co Donegal. He tried to control one-off housing, produced the first design guide and used to appeal to An Bord Pleanála, on his own behalf and at his own expense, all decisions to grant planning permission pushed through via the infamous S4 motions.

Since he left the Council, he has consistently claimed that there was bullying and intimidation within the council of planners who sought to make decisions based exclusively on the planning merits of particular applications. He was pilloried in the local media. Indeed, he claims one councilor constantly referred to him as a ”wee shit from the North”. Michael McLoone attributes the fractiousness to differences of personality and says Convie is motivated by revenge.

Jim Harley rose from junior planning positions to become Donegal County Council’s Senior Planner, while also often Acting as Director of Planning, within a period of two years after Convie’s departure, until he resigned in 2006. Senior planners make recommendations to the County Manager who usually would be expected to follow them.

In an affidavit that has been opened in court, Convie alleges Harley:

1) recommended permissions for members of his family, his friends and associates that breached the relevant Development Plans – the democratic, legal, planning constitution – to an extent that was almost systemic;

2) submitted planning applications to Donegal County Council on behalf of friends and associates;

3) dealt with planning applications submitted by himself from submission to decision and in express time;

4) ignored the recommendations of other planners;

5) destroyed the recommendations of other planners;

6) submitted fraudulent correspondence to the planning department;

7) forged signatures;

8) improperly interfered and used inappropriate influence as described in a number of planning applications;

9) was improperly close to a number of leading architects and developers in Donegal, including having a family relationship with the head of the largest ‘architectural’ practice in Donegal, with whom he holidayed but the relationship with whom was never declared.

In the affidavit opened in court, Convie alleges:

  • Jim Harley inappropriately manipulated planning applications at Ballyliffin in Inishowen to promote planning permissions for associates of his on lands where permission had previously been refused and there had been no change in policy or in the development plan.

  • A next-door neighbour of Jim Harley submitted an outline planning application for a site he owned in an area of exceptionally high amenity between the road and sea at Malin Head, for which previous applications for other people had been unsuccessful. Jim Harley dealt with the planning application, while Convie was on leave, recommending granting permission, and did not make a declaration of interest. Later, the neighbour made an application for full permission pursuant to the outline permission. Jim Harley submitted the application and, according to Convie, forged the name “K O’Donnell” on the plans. In the end, another planner in the Council, in record time, recommended allowing permission and this was endorsed by Convie as it was predicated on the outline permission. Later Harley submitted an application for his own holiday house within these overall lands, with a declaration of interest. The problem was the failure to declare his interest in applications that were not in his name. A third party complained about the neighbour’s house, when it was built. Harley dealt with the complaint, saying – counterfactually – that it was in accordance with the permission. This complainant has also made complaints about Harley to the Minister. Subsequently the neighbour obtained permission for two more houses close by. Harley again submitted the application. A planner recommended refusal but Harley scribbled out the recommendation and granted permission, while Convie was away, with no reports from any other official, except one from the roads engineer noting there was an invalidating lack of a public notice. Despite demands from another senior planning official and An Taisce, and queries from TV3 and the Irish Times, Michael Mc Loone never investigated Harley’s involvements at Malin Head.

  • A senior official in Donegal County Council persuaded the National Roads Authority to withdraw its planning appeal of a shopping centre in Dungloe, following representations from Jim Harley who resigned from the Council in May 2006 and was by June 2006 representing the developers of the shopping centre.

  • Jim Harley manipulated the planning process for lands in Malin Head which had been zoned the highest category of landscape in the county so his brother and sister-in-law got planning permission, though others had been refused and planning officials recommended refusal. For the later application by the couple, Harley, along with McLoone, made appropriate declarations and said they would not deal with those applications.

  • Former Fianna Fáil Councillor, Noel McGinley, got planning permission, on the recommendation of Jim Harley, for a massive high-rise retail and housing development in Letterkenny contrary to the Letterkenny and Environs Plan and despite 20 questions asked of McGinley by another planning official going unanswered.

  • Michael McLoone ensured that an unauthorised, dangerously sited filling station outside Ballyshannon, belonging to friends of his, was permitted to continue without planning permission and contrary to the County Development Plan for five years along a National Primary Road, despite objections from all other relevant senior personnel in the County and, since the site straddles the border, the RUC, over the course of a remarkable seven or eight attempts to gain retrospective permission for the illegal development. In the end, Mr McLoone [outside his area of authority] contrived the erection of speed limits that conduced to retention of the garage, though the National Roads Authority reversed this action and removed the speed limits following complaints from a third party. Calls on the then Minister Noel Dempsey, for immediate action, went unheeded. Several other illegal border petrol stations had been promptly closed by Council action but McLoone only took action in this case when the matter generated controversy in the press.

  • Convie claims that Jim Harley told him that Michael McLoone told Harley, one time when they were playing golf together, that he wanted a planning application by someone he has publicly admitted is a friend of his in South Donegal to get planning permission, though a previous application for the same person had been refused on grounds of visual amenity. Convie claims, and the file shows, that he was then bypassed in the processing of the new planning application. Even though the friend’s home is only a few miles from the new house he claimed it was to be a “holiday” home, not for onward sale. Afterwards the house was sold several times.

  • Fine Gael councillor Bernard McGuinness got permission to build four houses outside Culdaff only, according to Gerry Convie’s affidavit, after Michael McLoone’s personal assistant improperly leant on him and others, to grant permission, and despite the site being outside the draft proposed limit of development for the village and despite being advised that planning permission would not be forthcoming. The limit was later moved, to the approval of Convie. Michael McLoone told councillors he had had no role in the permission.

  • An associate of Michael McLoone who is also the brother-in-law of Jim Harley had the water supply to his new house unprecedentedly paid for by Donegal County Council at a cost of £26,000, against the advice of the Sanitary Services Officer. In the relevant planning permission, there was a development charge levied in respect of the water supply. According to Convie, the scrapping of development charges for his friends and associates is cause for concern and investigation.

  • Convie claims that “there must be dozens, possibly hundreds of other such cases” besides the 20 Case Studies presented to the Minister.

The Convie file was referred to the Attorney General for direction and she has now reported back to the Minister. The Department will report its review before the summer [of 2014].

After the Greens got into government, Environment Minister, John Gormley, announced “planning reviews” in 2010, not of corruption, but of bad practice in seven local authorities including Donegal. Convie’s case studies comprised all the material for the review in Donegal. But when the new Fine Gael and Labour government took over, they very quickly dropped the independent inquiries which John Gormley had initiated. A lazy 2012 internal review, which has been labelled a whitewash by the former Minister, stated: “The department’s rigorous analysis finds that the allegations do not relate to systemic corruption in the planning system…Nonetheless, they raise serious matters, ranging from maladministration to inconsistency in application of planning policy or non-adherence to forward plans, such as development plans”. As regards Donegal, the Department, extraordinarily and scandalously, concluded, according to Minister Jan O’Sullivan in the Dáil: ‘’ … the complainant [i.e. Convie] has failed at any stage to produce evidence of wrong-doing in Donegal Council’s planning department”.

Mr Convie felt this left him in an invidious position and he successfully sued. In the High Court Order, all the conclusions by the Minister were withdrawn.

After he won his High Court case [in 2013], the Department conceded that his allegations were never really investigated, acknowledged his seriously held concerns relating to planning matters in Donegal, regretted any adverse comment on his motivation and any negative impact on his right to a good name, professional integrity or reputation, paid him compensation and covered all his legal costs.

The new government was forced to reinstate the planning enquiries in the other six local planning authorities. But beyond this, it will be important to see the ramifications for the civil servants who concluded that Convie’s complaints did not constitute “evidence”, who have so defamed him, and – in an era where attention to ethics in planning is universally regarded as an imperative requiring scrupulous care – for the Minister, Jan O’Sullivan, who accepted the conclusions and placed them before Dáil Eireann.

McLoone successfully sued the Donegal Democrat which had called him “corrupt”. Convie claims he advised them not to use that word as no one ever suggested money changed hands inappropriately which he felt, at the time, was determinant. The Democrat put up no defence.

McLoone consistently distanced himself from the alleged irregularities on the basis that they “happened on Convie’s watch” and has referred to “highly personalized and unwarranted remarks about individual members of the Council’s planning staff…[which] may amount to actionable defamation” but Convie claims the allegations are more specific and less easily denied or obfuscated than that.

The current County Manager, Séamus Neely, has enthusiastically expressed his support for the actions and statements of Mr McLoone in all these matters and goes so far as to state that there is nothing wrong with the type of relationships which Jim Harley cultivated and has expressed support for the treatment of Convie by McLoone.

Though several key planning staff – including McLoone and senior planners Convie and Harley – no longer work in the County Council, the review is underway.

The Department of the Environment told Village “clarification of legal issues has delayed the original time-frame … in relation to the position of Donegal County Council the Department has sought the advice of the Attorney General before deciding on a course of action. This advice is expected in the coming weeks”. And all the while Convie awaits the consequences of his long-delayed vindication.